These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30983663)

  • 21. Law & psychiatry: insanity, guilty minds, and psychiatric testimony.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2006 Oct; 57(10):1370-2. PubMed ID: 17035552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The insanity verdict, the psychopath, and post-acquittal confinement.
    Halpern AL
    Psychiatr Q; 1992; 63(3):209-43. PubMed ID: 1488463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Not a "Get Out of Jail Free Card": Comparing the Legal Supervision of Persons Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder and Convicted Offenders.
    Martin S; Charette Y; Leclerc C; Seto MC; Nicholls TL; Crocker AG
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():775480. PubMed ID: 35115962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Court diversion in perspective.
    James DV
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006; 40(6-7):529-38. PubMed ID: 16756577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The insanity defense: examination of the extent of congruence between psychiatric recommendation and adjudication.
    Pikona-Sapir A; Melamed Y; Elizur A
    Med Law; 2001; 20(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 11401242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Examining the effect of religiosity, moral disengagement, personal attribution, comprehension and proximity on juror decision making regarding insanity pleas.
    Tate B; Yelderman LA
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(6):809-831. PubMed ID: 36267606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender, mental illness and the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
    Pathare S; Nardodkar R; Shields L; Bunders JF; Sagade J
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 25716434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
    Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors associated with a successful insanity plea.
    Steadman HJ; Keitner L; Braff J; Arvanites TM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Apr; 140(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 6837773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Applications for release by Australians in Victoria found not guilty of offences of violence by reason of mental impairment.
    Freckelton I
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(4):375-404. PubMed ID: 16039342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 33627379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of the new provisions for sanctioning mentally disordered offenders in China, in a broader historical context.
    Pei W; van der Wolf M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):31-39. PubMed ID: 27267262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois.
    Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 3365475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers.
    Dezember A; Redlich AD
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Aug; 48(4):262-280. PubMed ID: 39325405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Section 377 and The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: Breaking barriers.
    Kapoor A; Pathare S
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4(2):111-114. PubMed ID: 30683633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychiatric defenses in New York County: pleas and results.
    Kirschner SM; Galperin GJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 11471786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.