These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The semantic structure of accuracy in eyewitness testimony. Gustafsson PU; Sikström S; Lindholm T Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1211987. PubMed ID: 38659679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring. Robinson MD; Johnson JT; Robertson DA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Sep; 6(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 11014053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Saraiva RB; Hope L; Horselenberg R; Ost J; Sauer JD; van Koppen PJ Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31699019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring the source monitoring. Luna K; Martín-Luengo B Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 23553316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of cross-examination style questions on adult eyewitness accuracy depends on question type and eyewitness confidence. Wade KA; Spearing ER Memory; 2023 Feb; 31(2):163-178. PubMed ID: 36184815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extra effort during memory retrieval may be associated with increases in eyewitness confidence. Shaw JS; Zerr TK Law Hum Behav; 2003 Jun; 27(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 12794967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval. Harris CB; O'Connor AR; Sutton J Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():204-16. PubMed ID: 25617861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Signatures of Memory: Brain Coactivations during Retrieval Distinguish Correct from Incorrect Recollection. Mendelsohn A; Furman O; Dudai Y Front Behav Neurosci; 2010; 4():18. PubMed ID: 20428498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imagery ability and source monitoring: implications for eyewitness memory. Dobson M; Markham R Br J Psychol; 1993 Feb; 84 ( Pt 1)():111-8. PubMed ID: 8467368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories. Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of alcohol and co-witness information on memory reports: a field study. Bartlett G; Albery IP; Frings D; Gawrylowicz J Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2022 Sep; 239(9):2945-2953. PubMed ID: 35764830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of cue content on retrieval from autobiographical memory. Uzer T; Brown NR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():84-91. PubMed ID: 27940026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of co-witness discussion on confidence and precision in eyewitness memory reports. Rechdan J; Hope L; Sauer JD; Sauerland M; Ost J; Merckelbach H Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):904-912. PubMed ID: 29534645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How intention to retrieve a memory and expectation that a memory will come to mind influence the retrieval of autobiographical memories. Barzykowski K; Niedźwieńska A; Mazzoni G Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jul; 72():31-48. PubMed ID: 31078046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations. Smith VL; Kassin SM; Ellsworth PC J Appl Psychol; 1989 Apr; 74(2):356-9. PubMed ID: 2708267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the ease-of-retrieval effect in an eyewitness context. Groncki R; Beaudry JL; Sauer JD Memory; 2021 Feb; 29(2):234-254. PubMed ID: 33557719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues. Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]