160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30984494)
1. Decompression Versus Fusion for Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis.
Koenig S; Jauregui JJ; Shasti M; Jazini E; Koh EY; Banagan KE; Gelb DE; Ludwig SC
Global Spine J; 2019 Apr; 9(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30984494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis.
Kuo CC; Merchant M; Kardile MP; Yacob A; Majid K; Bains RS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):1530-1537. PubMed ID: 31181016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang HF; Liu SH; Chen ZX; Fei QM
Eur Spine J; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3084-3095. PubMed ID: 28647763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Concomitant Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Influence the Outcome of Decompression Alone in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
Wang M; Luo XJ; Ye YJ; Zhang Z
World Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 123():226-238. PubMed ID: 30576810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis.
Chen Z; Xie P; Feng F; Chhantyal K; Yang Y; Rong L
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e165-e177. PubMed ID: 29248779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang W; Yuwen P; Zhu Y; Wei N; Feng C; Zhang Y; Chen W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):637-650. PubMed ID: 28361467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial.
Smorgick Y; Park DK; Baker KC; Lurie JD; Tosteson TD; Zhao W; Herkowitz HN; Fischgrund JS; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):797-805. PubMed ID: 23169068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Fusion or Decompression Alone Results in Similar Rates of Reoperation at 5 Years.
Vorhies JS; Hernandez-Boussard T; Alamin T
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E74-E79. PubMed ID: 28671881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients.
Sigmundsson FG; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 25450653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.
Joelson A; Nerelius F; Holy M; Sigmundsson FG
Acta Orthop; 2021 Jun; 92(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 33506701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up.
Sato S; Yagi M; Machida M; Yasuda A; Konomi T; Miyake A; Fujiyoshi K; Kaneko S; Takemitsu M; Machida M; Yato Y; Asazuma T
Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1536-44. PubMed ID: 25681581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors predicting opioid dependence in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis from the MarketScan databases.
Sharma M; Ugiliweneza B; Aljuboori Z; Nuño MA; Drazin D; Boakye M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):271-278. PubMed ID: 29914294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study.
Inose H; Kato T; Yuasa M; Yamada T; Maehara H; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Kawabata S; Okawa A
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Aug; 31(7):E347-E352. PubMed ID: 29877872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
