BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30984972)

  • 1. Time-to-event model-assisted designs for dose-finding trials with delayed toxicity.
    Lin R; Yuan Y
    Biostatistics; 2020 Oct; 21(4):807-824. PubMed ID: 30984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TITE-BOIN12: A Bayesian phase I/II trial design to find the optimal biological dose with late-onset toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhou Y; Lin R; Lee JJ; Li D; Wang L; Li R; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 35098585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.
    Yuan Y; Lin R; Li D; Nie L; Warren KE
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 24(20):4921-4930. PubMed ID: 29769209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
    Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
    Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
    Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keyboard design for phase I drug-combination trials.
    Pan H; Lin R; Zhou Y; Yuan Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 May; 92():105972. PubMed ID: 32151751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AIDE: Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation designs to accelerate Phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou Y; Zhao Y; Cicconetti G; Mu Y; Yuan Y; Wang L; Penugonda S; Salman Z
    Pharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 22(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 36333972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app.
    Pallmann P; Wan F; Mander AP; Wheeler GM; Yap C; Clive S; Hampson LV; Jaki T
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 31856600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.
    Lin R; Yuan Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(4):648-662. PubMed ID: 31258039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GUIP1: a R package for dose escalation strategies in phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Dinart D; Fraisse J; Tosi D; Mauguen A; Touraine C; Gourgou S; Le Deley MC; Bellera C; Mollevi C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):134. PubMed ID: 32580715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TITE-gBOIN: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding accounting for toxicity grades.
    Takeda K; Xia Q; Liu S; Rong A
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Mar; 21(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 34862715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Wang S; Bailey S; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1017-1034. PubMed ID: 33793044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
    Pan H; Xie F; Liu P; Xia J; Ji Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24137041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2018 Oct; 15(5):524-529. PubMed ID: 30101616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
    Liu R; Lin J; Li P
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.
    Ji Y; Wang SJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 31(14):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23569307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou H; Murray TA; Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2208-2222. PubMed ID: 29682777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric overdose control with late-onset toxicity in phase I clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Biostatistics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):180-194. PubMed ID: 27549121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-to-event calibration-free odds design: A robust efficient design for phase I trials with late-onset outcomes.
    Jin H; Yin G
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):773-783. PubMed ID: 37095681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.