385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30984979)
1. Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.
Ozulken K; Yuksel E; Tekin K; Kiziltoprak H; Aydogan S
J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):222-229. PubMed ID: 30984979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
Zhang Y; Chen Y
J Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 35(9):575-582. PubMed ID: 31498415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Study to Compare Visual Outcomes Between Wavefront-optimized and Topography-guided Ablation Profiles in Contralateral Eyes With Myopia.
Shetty R; Shroff R; Deshpande K; Gowda R; Lahane S; Jayadev C
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 33(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 28068440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.
Kim J; Choi SH; Lim DH; Yang CM; Yoon GJ; Chung TY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-Year Outcomes From a Prospective, Randomized, Eye-to-Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized PRK in Myopia.
Smith RG; Manche EE
J Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 36(3):160-168. PubMed ID: 32159820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
He L; Manche EE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25321951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal Higher Order Aberrations and Epithelial Remodeling With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Topography-guided and Customized Asphericity Ablation in the Contralateral Eye: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study.
Lyra AFV; Alves EM; Montenegro AA; Parente NS; Cardoso MT; Alves LM; Maia CB; Fontes BM; Nose W
J Refract Surg; 2023 Nov; 39(11):751-758. PubMed ID: 37937761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.
Roe JR; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():175-183. PubMed ID: 31173739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year outcomes from a prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2396-2402. PubMed ID: 23778091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Refractive, Visual, and Subjective Quality of Vision Outcomes for Astigmatism ⩾2.00 Diopters.
Wallerstein A; Caron-Cantin M; Gauvin M; Adiguzel E; Cohen M
J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 30742221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser
Tiwari NN; Sachdev GS; Ramamurthy S; Dandapani R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 66(11):1558-1561. PubMed ID: 30355860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes Comparison Between Wavefront-Optimized and Topography-Guided PRK in Contralateral Eyes With Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
Faria-Correia F; Ribeiro S; Lopes BT; Salomão MQ; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2020 Jun; 36(6):358-365. PubMed ID: 32521022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual outcomes after variable spot scanning ablation versus wavefront-optimized myopic LASIK.
Khalifa MA; Mossallam EF; Massoud TH; Shaheen MS
J Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 31(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25599540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Study of Primary SMILE, SMILE Enhancement, and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK on Higher Order Aberrations and Corneal Densitometry.
Foo VHX; Liu YC; Ang M; Htoon HM; Ting DSJ; Mehta JS
J Refract Surg; 2024 May; 40(5):e291-e303. PubMed ID: 38717083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Treating Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Versus Topography-Measured Anterior Corneal Astigmatism.
Wallerstein A; Gauvin M; Qi SR; Bashour M; Cohen M
J Refract Surg; 2019 Jan; 35(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 30633783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual Outcomes After LASIK Using Topography-Guided vs Wavefront-Guided Customized Ablation Systems.
Toda I; Ide T; Fukumoto T; Tsubota K
J Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 32(11):727-732. PubMed ID: 27824375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].
Anderle R; Ventruba J; Š S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2015 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25959784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
