121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30985086)
1. Optos wide-field imaging versus conventional camera imaging in Danish patients with type 2 diabetes.
Byberg S; Vistisen D; Diaz L; Charles MH; Hajari JN; Valerius M; Juul E; Jørgensen ME; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):815-820. PubMed ID: 30985086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems.
Hirano T; Imai A; Kasamatsu H; Kakihara S; Toriyama Y; Murata T
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):332. PubMed ID: 30572870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
Verma A; Alagorie AR; Ramasamy K; van Hemert J; Yadav NK; Pappuru RR; Tufail A; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Raman R;
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 31989286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of early diabetic retinopathy severity using ultra-widefield Clarus versus conventional five-field and ultra-widefield Optos fundus imaging.
Xiao Y; Dan H; Du X; Michaelide M; Nie X; Wang W; Zheng M; Wang D; Huang Z; Song Z
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17131. PubMed ID: 37816867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Standard 7-Field, Clarus, and Optos Ultrawidefield Imaging Systems for Diabetic Retinopathy (COCO Study).
Duncan N; Barrett N; Schildroth K; Chang JS; Channa R; Rickels K; Domalpally A; Blodi B
Ophthalmol Sci; 2024; 4(3):100427. PubMed ID: 38284100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-grader reliability in the Danish screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.
Thykjaer AS; Andresen J; Andersen N; Bek T; Heegaard S; Hajari J; Schmidt Laugesen C; Möller S; Pedersen FN; Kawasaki R; Højlund K; Rubin KH; Stokholm L; Peto T; Grauslund J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 101(7):783-788. PubMed ID: 37066883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-mydriatic ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with dilated fundal examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in Chinese individuals with diabetes mellitus.
Szeto SKH; Wong R; Lok J; Tang F; Sun Z; Tso T; Lam TCH; Tham CC; Ng DS; Cheung CY
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 103(9):1327-1331. PubMed ID: 30381391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior Segment Distortion in Ultra-Widefield Imaging Compared to Conventional Modalities.
Nicholson L; Goh LY; Marshall E; Vazquez-Alfageme C; Chatziralli I; Clemo M; Hykin PG; Sivaprasad S
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2016 Jul; 47(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 27434896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Two Ultra-Widefield Cameras With High Image Resolution and Wider View for Identifying Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions.
Khan R; Raman S; Karamcheti SKM; Srinivasan S; Sharma A; Surya J; Bhende M; Ramasamy K; Verma A; Raman R
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 10(12):9. PubMed ID: 34614162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of quantitative assessment and efficiency of diabetic retinopathy diagnosis using ETDRS seven-field imaging and two ultra-widefield imaging.
Xiao Y; Huang Z; Yuan Q; Du X; Li Z; Nie X; Shi Q; Dan H; Song Z
Eye (Lond); 2023 Dec; 37(17):3558-3564. PubMed ID: 37120657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of digital and film grading of diabetic retinopathy severity in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study.
Hubbard LD; Sun W; Cleary PA; Danis RP; Hainsworth DP; Peng Q; Susman RA; Aiello LP; Davis MD;
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 129(6):718-26. PubMed ID: 21670338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement on diabetic retinopathy grading in fundus photographs by allied ophthalmic personnel as compared to ophthalmologist at a community setting in Nepal.
Thapa R; Bajimaya S; Pradhan E; Paudyal G
Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 9(18):43-50. PubMed ID: 29022954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-observer agreement in grading severity of diabetic retinopathy in wide-field fundus photographs.
Srinivasan S; Suresh S; Chendilnathan C; Prakash V J; Sivaprasad S; Rajalakshmi R; Anjana RM; Malik RA; Kulothungan V; Raman R; Bhende M
Eye (Lond); 2023 Apr; 37(6):1231-1235. PubMed ID: 35595962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
Islam FMA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
