BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30986084)

  • 1. Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature.
    DeTora LM; Carey MA; Toroser D; Baum EZ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30986084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature.
    Stretton S
    BMJ Open; 2014 Jul; 4(7):e004777. PubMed ID: 25023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications: results of a Delphi study.
    Jacobs A; Carpenter J; Donnelly J; Klapproth JF; Gertel A; Hall G; Jones AH; Laing S; Lang T; Langdon-Neuner E; Wager L; Whittington R;
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15818870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building consensus on author selection practices for industry-sponsored research: recommendations from an expert task force of medical publication professionals.
    Carfagno ML; Schweers SA; Whann EA; Hodgson MB; Mittleman KD; Nastasee SA; Sorgenfrei T; Kodukulla MI;
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2022 Jun; 38(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 35437066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hiring a professional medical writer: is it equivalent to ghostwriting?
    Das N; Das S
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24627711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.
    Ross JS; Hill KP; Egilman DS; Krumholz HM
    JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(15):1800-12. PubMed ID: 18413874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications.
    Stocks A; Simcoe D; Toroser D; DeTora L
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 29659302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Author and authorship in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2009; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19214815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
    Gøtzsche PC; Kassirer JP; Woolley KL; Wager E; Jacobs A; Gertel A; Hamilton C
    PLoS Med; 2009 Feb; 6(2):e23. PubMed ID: 19192943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spectre of ghostwriting: eroding public trust in physicians, clinical trial integrity and biomedical authorship.
    DeTora LM
    Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Jul; 70(7):630-3. PubMed ID: 27354171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Honorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications.
    Kennedy MS; Barnsteiner J; Daly J
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):416-22. PubMed ID: 24930670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "Monsanto papers" and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature.
    Matheson A
    Account Res; 2023 Jul; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 37424374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical behaviour of authors in biomedical journalism.
    Bevan JC
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Mar; 35(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 12755122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE criterion of authorship.
    Moffatt B
    Account Res; 2013; 20(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 23432769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical ghostwriting and informed consent.
    Almassi B
    Bioethics; 2014 Nov; 28(9):491-9. PubMed ID: 23444836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Authorship is Defined by Multiple Publishing Organizations and STM Publishers.
    da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Account Res; 2016; 23(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 26191641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.
    Gollogly L; Momen H
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():24-9. PubMed ID: 16924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Authorship and medical ghostwriting: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery policy.
    Sullivan D; Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2496-2500. PubMed ID: 21617482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing--strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics.
    Matheson A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 17():20. PubMed ID: 27044283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.