255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30986140)
1. Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
Venezia JH; Martin AG; Hickok G; Richards VM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1051-1067. PubMed ID: 30986140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
Venezia JH; Leek MR; Lindeman MP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Senescent Decline in Verbal-Emotion Identification by Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners - Do Hearing Aids Help?
Ruiz R; Fontan L; Fillol H; Füllgrabe C
Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():2073-2081. PubMed ID: 33173288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss.
Ferguson SH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification.
Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Singh G; Russo FA
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518801736. PubMed ID: 30249171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Rana B; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
