These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30986140)

  • 41. Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.
    Souza P; Gallun F; Wright R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):334-344. PubMed ID: 31940258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Vowel perception by noise masked normal-hearing young adults.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D; Coughlin M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1101-10. PubMed ID: 16158664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):478-89. PubMed ID: 8979036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants.
    Lunner T; Hietkamp RK; Andersen MR; Hopkins K; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22246137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of Varying Reverberation on Music Perception for Young Normal-Hearing and Old Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517750706. PubMed ID: 29320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mechanisms of Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection for Normal- and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Ponsot E; Varnet L; Wallaert N; Daoud E; Shamma SA; Lorenzi C; Neri P
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520978029. PubMed ID: 33620023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):455-65. PubMed ID: 26827039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.