These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30986566)

  • 21. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.
    Parra MA; Sánchez MG; Valencia S; Trujillo N
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 28288533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relationship between worry and attentional bias to threat cues signalling controllable and uncontrollable dangers.
    Georgiades J; Cusworth K; MacLeod C; Notebaert L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251350. PubMed ID: 33984007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2017 Apr; 17(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 27819442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Beyond attentional bias: a perceptual bias in a dot-probe task.
    Bocanegra BR; Huijding J; Zeelenberg R
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1362-6. PubMed ID: 22642346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attention processes in chronic fatigue syndrome: attentional bias for health-related threat and the role of attentional control.
    Hou R; Moss-Morris R; Risdale A; Lynch J; Jeevaratnam P; Bradley BP; Mogg K
    Behav Res Ther; 2014 Jan; 52():9-16. PubMed ID: 24262484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Eye movements reveal mechanisms underlying attentional biases towards threat.
    Sagliano L; D'Olimpio F; Taglialatela Scafati I; Trojano L
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Nov; 30(7):1344-51. PubMed ID: 26212202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional bias to food varies as a function of metabolic state independent of weight status.
    Stamataki NS; Elliott R; McKie S; McLaughlin JT
    Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104388. PubMed ID: 31376438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Atomoxetine effects on attentional bias to drug-related cues in cocaine dependent individuals.
    Passamonti L; Luijten M; Ziauddeen H; Coyle-Gilchrist ITS; Rittman T; Brain SAE; Regenthal R; Franken IHA; Sahakian BJ; Bullmore ET; Robbins TW; Ersche KD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Aug; 234(15):2289-2297. PubMed ID: 28551713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring attentional bias to threat in children and adolescents: a matter of speed?
    Van Damme S; Crombez G
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 40(2):344-51. PubMed ID: 19243739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: Evidence in the additional singleton paradigm.
    Wentura D; Müller P; Rothermund K; Voss A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 28376664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A category-specific top-down attentional set can affect the neural responses outside the current focus of attention.
    Jiang Y; Wu X; Gao X
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Oct; 659():80-85. PubMed ID: 28735084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 May; 206():103064. PubMed ID: 32416329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.
    Massar SA; Mol NM; Kenemans JL; Baas JM
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):805-17. PubMed ID: 21824022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Zoning out: Automatic and conscious attention biases are differentially related to dissociative and post-traumatic symptoms.
    Herzog S; D'Andrea W; DePierro J
    Psychiatry Res; 2019 Feb; 272():304-310. PubMed ID: 30597381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task.
    Chapman A; Devue C; Grimshaw GM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):308-320. PubMed ID: 29159699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional bias to alcohol stimuli predicts elevated cue-induced craving in young adult social drinkers.
    Manchery L; Yarmush DE; Luehring-Jones P; Erblich J
    Addict Behav; 2017 Jul; 70():14-17. PubMed ID: 28161617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of higher versus lower threat contexts on pain-related attention biases: An eye-tracking study.
    Jackson T; Su L; Wang Y
    Eur J Pain; 2018 Jul; 22(6):1113-1123. PubMed ID: 29364566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers.
    Attwood AS; O'Sullivan H; Leonards U; Mackintosh B; Munafò MR
    Addiction; 2008 Nov; 103(11):1875-82. PubMed ID: 19032536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.