These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30986747)

  • 1. Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data.
    Buckell J; Hess S
    J Health Econ; 2019 May; 65():93-102. PubMed ID: 30986747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cigarette Brand Preference and Pro-Tobacco Advertising Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2012-2016.
    Perks SN; Armour B; Agaku IT
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2018 Feb; 67(4):119-124. PubMed ID: 29389916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
    Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods.
    Rakotonarivo OS; Schaafsma M; Hockley N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():98-109. PubMed ID: 27576151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review.
    Regmi K; Kaphle D; Timilsina S; Tuha NAA
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2018 Mar; 2(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 29464666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationships between menthol cigarette preference and state tobacco control policies on smoking behaviors of young adult smokers in the 2006-07 Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Surveys (TUS CPS).
    Ahijevych K; Ford J
    Addiction; 2010 Dec; 105 Suppl 1():46-54. PubMed ID: 21059136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphic Warning Labels Affect Hypothetical Cigarette Purchasing Behavior among Smokers Living with HIV.
    Pacek LR; Berry MS; Rass O; Mercincavage M; McClernon FJ; Johnson MW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 31547374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eliciting preferences for waterpipe tobacco smoking using a discrete choice experiment: implications for product regulation.
    Salloum RG; Maziak W; Hammond D; Nakkash R; Islam F; Cheng X; Thrasher JF
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009497. PubMed ID: 26353876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in smokers' attitudes toward intended cessation attempts in Japan.
    Goto R; Takahashi Y; Ida T
    Value Health; 2011; 14(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 21839419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When health policy and empirical evidence collide: the case of cigarette package warning labels and economic consumer surplus.
    Song AV; Brown P; Glantz SA
    Am J Public Health; 2014 Feb; 104(2):e42-51. PubMed ID: 24328661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.
    Hauber AB; González JM; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Prior T; Marshall DA; Cunningham C; IJzerman MJ; Bridges JF
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 27325321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared.
    Lambooij MS; Harmsen IA; Veldwijk J; de Melker H; Mollema L; van Weert YW; de Wit GA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():19. PubMed ID: 25887890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsiveness to cigarette prices by different racial/ethnic groups of US adults.
    Yao T; Ong MK; Max W; Keeler C; Wang Y; Yerger VB; Sung HY
    Tob Control; 2018 May; 27(3):301-309. PubMed ID: 28747492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments--a QALY space model approach.
    Gu Y; Norman R; Viney R
    Health Econ; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1098-114. PubMed ID: 24943827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors.
    Sadique Z; Cairns J; De Corte K; Willis S; Miners A; Bansback N; Grieve R
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):362-373. PubMed ID: 36565248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.