These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30989625)

  • 21. The effect of alcohol dependence on automatic visuo-spatial perspective taking.
    Cox S; Chandler C; Simpson A; Riggs K
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2016 Sep; 166():21-5. PubMed ID: 27350654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unilateral vestibular deafferentation impairs embodied spatial cognition.
    Deroualle D; Borel L; Tanguy B; Bernard-Demanze L; Devèze A; Montava M; Lavieille JP; Lopez C
    J Neurol; 2019 Sep; 266(Suppl 1):149-159. PubMed ID: 31230115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.
    Gunalp P; Moossaian T; Hegarty M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30783909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developmental changes in the embodied self of spatial perspective taking.
    Watanabe M
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Jun; 34(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 26659644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking.
    Ford B; Monk R; Litchfield D; Qureshi A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1431-1441. PubMed ID: 36781684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Taking the perspectives of many people: Humanization matters.
    Ye T; Furumi F; Catarino da Silva D; Hamilton A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):888-897. PubMed ID: 33319316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modulation of behavioral and brain responses to visual perspective taking by social rejection: Evidence from electrophysiology.
    Peng S; Leng Y; Ge S; Tao D; Ding M; Zheng W; Deng H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():135-143. PubMed ID: 30391359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Object-based mental rotation and visual perspective-taking in typical development and Williams syndrome.
    Broadbent HJ; Farran EK; Tolmie A
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2014; 39(3):205-25. PubMed ID: 24742311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction impairs third-person perspective taking.
    van Elk M; Duizer M; Sligte I; van Schie H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 17(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 27649972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mental spatial transformations of objects and bodies: different developmental trajectories in children from 7 to 11 years of age.
    Crescentini C; Fabbro F; Urgesi C
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Feb; 50(2):370-83. PubMed ID: 23815701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Brain mechanisms of visuospatial perspective-taking in relation to object mental rotation and the theory of mind.
    Gunia A; Moraresku S; Vlček K
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Jun; 407():113247. PubMed ID: 33745982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task.
    May M; Wendt M
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S257-60. PubMed ID: 22806652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Out of your sight, out of my mind: Knowledge about another person's visual access modulates spontaneous visuospatial perspective-taking.
    Freundlieb M; Sebanz N; Kovács ÁM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 28263631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental rotation impairs attention shifting and short-term memory encoding: neurophysiological evidence against the response-selection bottleneck model of dual-task performance.
    Pannebakker MM; Jolicœur P; van Dam WO; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR; Hommel B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):2985-93. PubMed ID: 21736889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Imagined own-body transformations during passive self-motion.
    van Elk M; Blanke O
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jan; 78(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 23412705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity.
    Schurz M; Kronbichler M; Weissengruber S; Surtees A; Samson D; Perner J
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():386-96. PubMed ID: 25907759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Seeing it both ways: Using a double-cuing task to investigate the role of spatial cuing in Level-1 visual perspective-taking.
    Michael J; Wolf T; Letesson C; Butterfill S; Skewes J; Hohwy J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 29154620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Walking reduces the gap between encoding and sensorimotor alignment effects in spatial updating of described environments.
    Santoro I; Murgia M; Sors F; Agostini T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):750-760. PubMed ID: 26902327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.