BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30989761)

  • 1. Quality-based pharmacokinetic model selection on DCE-MRI for characterizing orbital lesions.
    Lecler A; Balvay D; Cuenod CA; Marais L; Zmuda M; Sadik JC; Galatoire O; Farah E; El Methni J; Zuber K; Bergès O; Savatovsky J; Fournier L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 30989761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in orbital lymphoproliferative disorders: Effects of region of interest selection methods on time efficiency, measurement reproducibility, and diagnostic ability.
    Qian W; Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Wu JF; Shi HB; Wu FY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1298-1305. PubMed ID: 28922524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiation between orbital malignant and benign tumors using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging: Correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Wu FY; Shi HB
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(12):e14897. PubMed ID: 30896639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of whole-lesion histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of breast lesions with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique.
    Li Z; Ai T; Hu Y; Yan X; Nickel MD; Xu X; Xia L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 28577335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benign and malignant orbital lymphoproliferative disorders: Differentiating using multiparametric MRI at 3.0T.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Liu H; Wu JF; Cao P; Shi HB; Wu FY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 27299917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DCE-MR imaging of orbital lesions: diagnostic performance of the tumor flow residence time τ calculated by a multi-compartmental pharmacokinetic tumor model based on individual factors.
    Erb-Eigner K; Asbach P; Ro SR; Haas M; Bertelmann E; Pietsch H; Schwenke C; Taupitz M; Denecke T; Hamm B; Lawaczeck R
    Acta Radiol; 2019 May; 60(5):643-652. PubMed ID: 30114927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.
    Zhang M; Horvat JV; Bernard-Davila B; Marino MA; Leithner D; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Helbich TH; Morris EA; Thakur S; Pinker K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):864-874. PubMed ID: 30375702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiomics Based on Multimodal MRI for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
    Zhang Q; Peng Y; Liu W; Bai J; Zheng J; Yang X; Zhou L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):596-607. PubMed ID: 32061014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI.
    Gity M; Parviz S; Saligheh Rad H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Shirali E; Shakiba M; Baikpour M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31030476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.
    El Khouli RH; Macura KJ; Kamel IR; Jacobs MA; Bluemke DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1498-505. PubMed ID: 22109308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
    Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.
    Chen L; Liu D; Zhang J; Xie B; Zhou X; Grimm R; Huang X; Wang J; Feng L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 29437281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the differentiation of benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.
    Choi YJ; Lee IS; Song YS; Kim JI; Choi KU; Song JW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):798-809. PubMed ID: 30663160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses.
    Xu XQ; Qian W; Ma G; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):903.e9-903.e15. PubMed ID: 28501096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
    Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
    Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiating between benign and malignant sinonasal lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion.
    Jiang J; Xiao Z; Tang Z; Zhong Y; Qiang J
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():7-13. PubMed ID: 29279173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
    Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive prediction of portal pressure with MR elastography and DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen: Preliminary results.
    Wagner M; Hectors S; Bane O; Gordic S; Kennedy P; Besa C; Schiano TD; Thung S; Fischman A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.