These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30989797)
1. Comparison of Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate and Retrograde Intramedullary Nail in the Fixation of Femoral Supracondylar Fractures in the Elderly: A Biomechanical Study. Du YR; Ma JX; Wang S; Sun L; Wang Y; Lu B; Bai HH; Hu YC; Ma XL Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 11(2):311-317. PubMed ID: 30989797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. Zlowodzki M; Williamson S; Cole PA; Zardiackas LD; Kregor PJ J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Sep; 18(8):494-502. PubMed ID: 15475844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures: comparative biomechanical performance of the 95-degree blade plate and two retrograde nails. Ito K; Grass R; Zwipp H J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 9619461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distal femoral fractures in the elderly: biomechanical analysis of a polyaxial angle-stable locking plate versus a retrograde intramedullary nail in a human cadaveric bone model. Bliemel C; Buecking B; Mueller T; Wack C; Koutras C; Beck T; Ruchholtz S; Zettl R Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 25388863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrograde intramedullary nails with distal screws locked to the nail have higher fatigue strength than locking plates in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures: A cadaver-based laboratory investigation. Pekmezci M; McDonald E; Buckley J; Kandemir U Bone Joint J; 2014 Jan; 96-B(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 24395321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical comparison of a distal femoral side plate and a retrograde intramedullary nail. Meyer RW; Plaxton NA; Postak PD; Gilmore A; Froimson MI; Greenwald AS J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Aug; 14(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 11001413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of locked plating and spiral blade retrograde nailing of supracondylar femur fractures. Assari S; Kaufmann A; Darvish K; Park J; Haw J; Safadi F; Rehman S Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1340-5. PubMed ID: 23672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-dimensional comparison of intramedullary nail constructs for osteopenic supracondylar femur fractures. Paller DJ; Frenzen SW; Bartlett CS; Beardsley CL; Beynnon BD J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Feb; 27(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 22534687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study. Khalafi A; Curtiss S; Hazelwood S; Wolinsky P J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 16990725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supplemental Fixation of Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dual-Plate and Plate-Nail Constructs. Wright DJ; DeSanto DJ; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Scolaro JA J Orthop Trauma; 2020 Aug; 34(8):434-440. PubMed ID: 32032183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate. David SM; Harrow ME; Peindl RD; Frick SL; Kellam JF J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Jul; 11(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 9294798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of proximally placed femoral less-invasive stabilization system plates. Davis BC; McConda DB; Hubbard DF; Kish VL Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Feb; 44(2):E54-7. PubMed ID: 25658084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical comparison of endosteal substitution and lateral plate fixation in supracondylar fractures of the femur. Prayson MJ; Datta DK; Marshall MP J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Feb; 15(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11232661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of anterograde/retrograde nailing in supracondylar femoral fractures. Herrera A; Albareda J; Gabarre S; Ibarz E; Puértolas S; Mateo J; Gracia L Injury; 2020 Apr; 51 Suppl 1():S80-S88. PubMed ID: 32067772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long Segment Blocking Screws Increase the Stability of Retrograde Nail Fixation in Geriatric Supracondylar Femur Fractures: Eliminating the "Bell-Clapper Effect". Auston D; Donohue D; Stoops K; Cox J; Diaz M; Santoni B; Mir H J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Nov; 32(11):559-564. PubMed ID: 30086037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: comparison of mechanical stability. Başcı O; Karakaşlı A; Kumtepe E; Güran O; Havıtçıoğlu H Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2015; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25741916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Operative treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures]. He L; Guo WG; Sun L Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 43(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 15842919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate]. Krbec M; Motycka J; Lunácek L; Dousa P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Dec; 76(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 20067694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]