These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30991126)

  • 1. Low-frequency cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics.
    Di Liberto GM; Wong D; Melnik GA; de Cheveigné A
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():237-247. PubMed ID: 30991126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal and language-specific sublexical cues in speech perception: a novel electroencephalography-lesion approach.
    Obrig H; Mentzel J; Rossi S
    Brain; 2016 Jun; 139(Pt 6):1800-16. PubMed ID: 27190021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory cortical tuning to statistical regularities in phonology.
    Bonte ML; Mitterer H; Zellagui N; Poelmans H; Blomert L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 116(12):2765-74. PubMed ID: 16256430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deviant neural processing of phonotactic probabilities in adults with dyslexia.
    Noordenbos MW; Segers E; Mitterer H; Serniclaes W; Verhoeven L
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):746-50. PubMed ID: 23903462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit processing of phonotactic cues: evidence from electrophysiological and vascular responses.
    Rossi S; Jürgenson IB; Hanulíková A; Telkemeyer S; Wartenburger I; Obrig H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1752-64. PubMed ID: 20666594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.
    Khalighinejad B; Cruzatto da Silva G; Mesgarani N
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(8):2176-2185. PubMed ID: 28119400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech.
    Emmendorfer AK; Correia JM; Jansma BM; Kotz SA; Bonte M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9917. PubMed ID: 32555256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical Measures of Phoneme-Level Speech Encoding Correlate with the Perceived Clarity of Natural Speech.
    Di Liberto GM; Crosse MJ; Lalor EC
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29662947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When statistics collide: The use of transitional and phonotactic probability cues to word boundaries.
    Dal Ben R; Souza DH; Hay JF
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1300-1310. PubMed ID: 33751490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indexing cortical entrainment to natural speech at the phonemic level: Methodological considerations for applied research.
    Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():70-77. PubMed ID: 28246030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic encoding of speech sequence probability in human temporal cortex.
    Leonard MK; Bouchard KE; Tang C; Chang EF
    J Neurosci; 2015 May; 35(18):7203-14. PubMed ID: 25948269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonotactic constraint violations in German grammar are detected automatically in auditory speech processing: a human event-related potentials study.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1208-16. PubMed ID: 21476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonotactic processing deficit following left-hemisphere stroke.
    Ghaleh M; Skipper-Kallal LM; Xing S; Lacey E; DeWitt I; DeMarco A; Turkeltaub P
    Cortex; 2018 Feb; 99():346-357. PubMed ID: 29351881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic Phonotactics as a Cue for Recognizing Spoken Cantonese Words in Speech.
    Yip MC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):201-210. PubMed ID: 27090111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Bowen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066017. PubMed ID: 31426053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20381548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.