These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30992113)

  • 21. Effect of Sandblasting and Type of Cement on the Bond Strength of Molar Bands on Stainless Steel Crowns.
    Bawazir OA; Elaraby A; Alshamrani H; Salama FS
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 26349792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative evaluation of biodentine, 2% chlorhexidine with RMGIC and calcium hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in primary molars: An
    Boddeda KR; Rani CR; V Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 30804309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base.
    Nematollahi H; Sahebnasagh M; Parisay I
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22524073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Attari N; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):427-31. PubMed ID: 15870802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical and radiographic success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulphate pulpotomies performed by dental students.
    Odabaş ME; Alaçam A; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 22762173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars.
    Juneja P; Kulkarni S
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Aug; 18(4):271-278. PubMed ID: 28780718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH; Subba Reddy VV; Basappa N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of Vital Pulp Therapies in Primary Teeth 2024.
    Coll JA; Dhar V; Chen CY; Crystal YO; Guelmann M; Marghalani AA; AlShamali S; Xu Z; Glickman GN; Wedeward R
    Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jan; 46(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 38449041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The stress distribution of a primary molar tooth restored with stainless steel crown using different luting cements.
    Guler MS; Guler C; Belduz Kara N; Odabasi D; Bekci ML
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):269. PubMed ID: 38395853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human Pulp Responses to Partial Pulpotomy Treatment with TheraCal as Compared with Biodentine and ProRoot MTA: A Clinical Trial.
    Bakhtiar H; Nekoofar MH; Aminishakib P; Abedi F; Naghi Moosavi F; Esnaashari E; Azizi A; Esmailian S; Ellini MR; Mesgarzadeh V; Sezavar M; About I
    J Endod; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1786-1791. PubMed ID: 28822566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Shiflett K; White SN
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature.
    Guelmann M; Shapira J; Silva DR; Fuks AB
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22524071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: A 24-Month Follow-up.
    Gonzalez-Lara A; Ruiz-Rodriguez MS; Pierdant-Perez M; Garrocho-Rangel JA; Pozos-Guillen AJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 26950810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Community dental officers' use and knowledge of restorative techniques for primary molars: an audit of two Trusts in Wales.
    Maggs-Rapport FL; Treasure ET; Chadwick BL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11310098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar.
    Croll TP; Killian CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):383-8. PubMed ID: 1502315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
    Ruby JD; Cox CF; Mitchell SC; Makhija S; Chompu-Inwai P; Jackson J
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22502601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation and comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine in primary tooth pulpotomy: Clinical and radiographic study.
    Carti O; Oznurhan F
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1604-1609. PubMed ID: 29378994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.
    Marvin JC; Gallegos SI; Parsaei S; Rodrigues DC
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e705-e712. PubMed ID: 29522263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.