224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30993409)
21. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition.
Friedrich J; Beste C
Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 410():191-201. PubMed ID: 31100340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.
Milanese N; Iani C; Rubichi S
Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20381024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Joint Simon effect in movement trajectories.
Sangati E; Slors M; Müller BCN; van Rooij I
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261735. PubMed ID: 34965256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30187398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task.
Guagnano D; Rusconi E; Umiltà CA
Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 19914615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.
Klempova B; Liepelt R
Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1158-1176. PubMed ID: 28689319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation.
Nakata H; Inui K; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Sakamoto M; Kida T; Wasaka T; Kakigi R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Feb; 115(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 14744578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. External coding and salience in the tactile Simon effect.
Medina J; Theodoropoulos N; Liu Y; Reyes PG; Gherri E
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102874. PubMed ID: 31299458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.
Medina J; McCloskey M; Coslett HB; Rapp B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2131-42. PubMed ID: 25243674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differences in blood flow between auditory and visual stimuli in the Psychomotor Vigilance Task and GO/NOGO Task.
Hiroyasu T; Fukushima A; Yokouchi H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1466-9. PubMed ID: 23366178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial Response Discrimination May Elicit a Simon Effect on a Non-Complementary Task.
Lam MY; Chua R
Percept Mot Skills; 2024 Feb; 131(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 38009872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.
Karlinsky A; Lam MY; Chua R; Hodges NJ
Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 28795222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
Wahn B; König P
Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. BOLD responses to tactile stimuli in visual and auditory cortex depend on the frequency content of stimulation.
Nordmark PF; Pruszynski JA; Johansson RS
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2120-34. PubMed ID: 22721377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Emergence of the go/no-go Simon effect by means of practice and mixing paradigms.
Lugli L; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 23743341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the attention network test using vibrotactile stimulations.
Salzer Y; Oron-Gilad T; Henik A
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 24878598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
