These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30993409)

  • 41. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.
    Salisbury DF; Griggs CB; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 15203056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks.
    Tekok-Kilic A; Shucard JL; Shucard DW
    Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):578-89. PubMed ID: 11352146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Action-space coding in social contexts.
    Ciardo F; Lugli L; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S; Iani C
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22673. PubMed ID: 26940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Simon effects in action sequences.
    Braun C; Kibele A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 30076426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.
    Sellaro R; Dolk T; Colzato LS; Liepelt R; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 25528013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.
    Iani C; Ciardo F; Panajoli S; Lugli L; Rubichi S
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):521-532. PubMed ID: 31768627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Simon effect under reversed visual feedback.
    Sabek H; Heurley LP; Guerineau R; Dru V
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1141-1156. PubMed ID: 38451272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sharing Different Reference Frames: How Stimulus Setup and Task Setup Shape Egocentric and Allocentric Simon Effects.
    Baess P; Weber T; Bermeitinger C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2063. PubMed ID: 30555364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.
    Shafaei R; Bahmani Z; Bahrami B; Vaziri-Pashkam M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18107. PubMed ID: 33093544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E; Brown R; Poliakoff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.
    Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.