236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30993424)
1. A critical appraisal of biomarkers in prostate cancer.
Narayan VM
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):547-554. PubMed ID: 30993424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
Tomlins SA; Day JR; Lonigro RJ; Hovelson DH; Siddiqui J; Kunju LP; Dunn RL; Meyer S; Hodge P; Groskopf J; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25985884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Adaptive Utility Trial to Validate Performance of a Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen 2-10ng/ml at Initial Biopsy.
McKiernan J; Donovan MJ; Margolis E; Partin A; Carter B; Brown G; Torkler P; Noerholm M; Skog J; Shore N; Andriole G; Thompson I; Carroll P
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):731-738. PubMed ID: 30237023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.
Vedder MM; de Bekker-Grob EW; Lilja HG; Vickers AJ; van Leenders GJ; Steyerberg EW; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 25168616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of current biomarkers for prostate cancer detection.
Kim JH; Hong SK
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 33381926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.
Hendriks RJ; van Oort IM; Schalken JA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Mar; 20(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27922627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial prostate biopsy: development and internal validation of a biopsy-specific nomogram based on the prostate cancer antigen 3 assay.
Hansen J; Auprich M; Ahyai SA; de la Taille A; van Poppel H; Marberger M; Stenzl A; Mulders PF; Huland H; Fisch M; Abbou CC; Schalken JA; Fradet Y; Marks LS; Ellis W; Partin AW; Pummer K; Graefen M; Haese A; Walz J; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Chun FK
Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 22854248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathological patterns influence Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) score.
De Luca S; Passera R; Bollito E; Milillo A; Scarpa RM; Papotti M; Coda R; Randone DF
Anticancer Res; 2013 Oct; 33(10):4657-62. PubMed ID: 24123045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer.
Stephan C; Jung K; Semjonow A; Schulze-Forster K; Cammann H; Hu X; Meyer HA; Bögemann M; Miller K; Friedersdorff F
Clin Chem; 2013 Jan; 59(1):280-8. PubMed ID: 23213079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of High-grade Prostate Cancer Using a Urinary Molecular Biomarker-Based Risk Score.
Van Neste L; Hendriks RJ; Dijkstra S; Trooskens G; Cornel EB; Jannink SA; de Jong H; Hessels D; Smit FP; Melchers WJ; Leyten GH; de Reijke TM; Vergunst H; Kil P; Knipscheer BC; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Mulders PF; van Oort IM; Van Criekinge W; Schalken JA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):740-748. PubMed ID: 27108162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.
Grönberg H; Adolfsson J; Aly M; Nordström T; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Clements M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Dec; 16(16):1667-76. PubMed ID: 26563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer.
Parekh DJ; Punnen S; Sjoberg DD; Asroff SW; Bailen JL; Cochran JS; Concepcion R; David RD; Deck KB; Dumbadze I; Gambla M; Grable MS; Henderson RJ; Karsh L; Krisch EB; Langford TD; Lin DW; McGee SM; Munoz JJ; Pieczonka CM; Rieger-Christ K; Saltzstein DR; Scott JW; Shore ND; Sieber PR; Waldmann TM; Wolk FN; Zappala SM
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 25454615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining urinary detection of TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 with serum PSA to predict diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Salami SS; Schmidt F; Laxman B; Regan MM; Rickman DS; Scherr D; Bueti G; Siddiqui J; Tomlins SA; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM; Rubin MA; Sanda MG
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 21600800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical use of novel urine and blood based prostate cancer biomarkers: a review.
Dijkstra S; Mulders PF; Schalken JA
Clin Biochem; 2014 Jul; 47(10-11):889-96. PubMed ID: 24177197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate Health Index (Phi) and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml.
Ferro M; Bruzzese D; Perdonà S; Marino A; Mazzarella C; Perruolo G; D'Esposito V; Cosimato V; Buonerba C; Di Lorenzo G; Musi G; De Cobelli O; Chun FK; Terracciano D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67687. PubMed ID: 23861782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are localized prostate cancer biomarkers useful in the clinical practice?
Carneiro A; Priante Kayano P; Gomes Barbosa ÁR; Langer Wroclawski M; Ko Chen C; Cavlini GC; Reche GJ; Sanchez-Salas R; Tobias-Machado M; Sowalsky AG; Bianco B
Tumour Biol; 2018 Sep; 40(9):1010428318799255. PubMed ID: 30204063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PROGENSA® prostate cancer antigen 3 assay and the Prostate Health Index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Nicholson A; Mahon J; Boland A; Beale S; Dwan K; Fleeman N; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Oct; 19(87):i-xxxi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 26507078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Meet the Criteria to Justify Its Inclusion in the Clinical Decision-Making Process?
Sanchis-Bonet A; Barrionuevo-González M; Bajo-Chueca A; Morales-Palacios N; Sanchez-Chapado M
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 29346783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PCA3 sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection in patients with abnormal PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. First Latin American experience.
Ramos CG; Valdevenito R; Vergara I; Anabalon P; Sanchez C; Fulla J
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1522-6. PubMed ID: 22687565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
