255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30993433)
21. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.
Li Y; Shao G; Wu M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Shao C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Feb; 50(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 37990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI in the assessment of adnexal masses.
Wu M; Tang Q; Cai S; Zhu L; Lin C; Guan Y; Rao S; Zhou J
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Feb; 159():110670. PubMed ID: 36584564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Efficiency of Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System Combined With 3-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluating Ovarian Tumor.
Yang L; Lv G; Chen H; Yang S; Liao J; Zhang W; Ke L
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Dec; 36(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 33298775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels.
Wu M; Zhang M; Cao J; Wu S; Chen Y; Luo L; Lin X; Su M; Zhang X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 308(2):631-637. PubMed ID: 35994107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interobserver agreement between eight observers using IOTA simple rules and O-RADS lexicon descriptors for adnexal masses.
Antil N; Raghu PR; Shen L; Tiyarattanachai T; Chang EM; Ferguson CWK; Ho AA; Lutz AM; Mariano AJ; Morimoto LN; Kamaya A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Sep; 47(9):3318-3326. PubMed ID: 35763052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. IETA Ultrasonic Features Combined with GI-RADS Classification System and Tumor Biomarkers for Surveillance of Endometrial Carcinoma: An Innovative Study.
Lin D; Wang H; Liu L; Zhao L; Chen J; Tian H; Gao L; Wu B; Zhang J; Guo X; Hao Y
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 36428723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors.
Guo Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M
Ultrasonography; 2022 Jul; 41(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 35196832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts.
Patel-Lippmann KK; Sadowski EA; Robbins JB; Paroder V; Barroilhet L; Maddox E; McMahon T; Sampene E; Wasnik AP; Blaty AD; Maturen KE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 31770022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement in Ultrasound BI-RADS Classification and Real-Time Elastography Tsukuba Score Assessment of Breast Lesions.
Schwab F; Redling K; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Schoenenberger CA; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2622-2629. PubMed ID: 27503826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy and validity of the O-RADS MRI score based on a simplified MRI protocol: a single tertiary center retrospective study.
Aslan S; Tosun SA
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):377-386. PubMed ID: 34839677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Pathology: Standardized Methods and Different Levels of Experience.
Tavoraitė I; Kronlachner L; Opolskienė G; Bartkevičienė D
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jul; 57(7):. PubMed ID: 34356989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of O-RADS Ultrasound and O-RADS MRI for Risk Assessment of Ovarian and Adnexal Lesions.
Zhang Q; Dai X; Li W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 36722758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Ultrasound Risk Score in Women in the United States.
Jha P; Gupta A; Baran TM; Maturen KE; Patel-Lippmann K; Zafar HM; Kamaya A; Antil N; Barroilhet L; Sadowski EA
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2216370. PubMed ID: 35679042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Osseous Tumor Reporting and Data System-Multireader Validation Study.
Chhabra A; Gupta A; Thakur U; Pezeshk P; Dettori N; Callan A; Xi Y; Weatherall P
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):571-585. PubMed ID: 34270485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Poncelet E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Guerra A; Fournier LS; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Bharwani N; Juhan V; Cunha TM; Masselli G; Balleyguier C; Malhaire C; Perrot NF; Sadowski EA; Bazot M; Taourel P; Porcher R; Darai E; Reinhold C; Rockall AG
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1919896. PubMed ID: 31977064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates.
Rizzo S; Cozzi A; Dolciami M; Del Grande F; Scarano AL; Papadia A; Gui B; Gandolfo N; Catalano C; Manganaro L
Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220795. PubMed ID: 36413127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the Performance of the Ultrasound (US) Elastographic Q-Analysis Score Combined With the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Malignancy Risk Stratification in Prostate Nodules Based on Transrectal US-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Imaging.
Ding Z; Ye X; Zhang L; Sun Y; Ni Z; Liu H; Xu J; Dong F
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2991-2998. PubMed ID: 30937942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
