786 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30993558)
21. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on quantitative and qualitative aspects for pulmonary nodule detection in digital 2-[
Lohaus N; Enderlin F; Skawran S; Maurer A; Abukwaik AMA; Franzen D; Huellner MW; Messerli M
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8308. PubMed ID: 35585129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.
Lantos J; Mittra ES; Levin CS; Iagaru A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 29755844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A multicentre comparison of quantitative (90)Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres : The QUEST Phantom Study.
Willowson KP; Tapner M; ; Bailey DL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1202-22. PubMed ID: 25967868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [
Liberini V; Messerli M; Husmann L; Kudura K; Grünig H; Maurer A; Skawran S; Orita E; Pizzuto DA; Deandreis D; Dummer R; Mangana J; Mihic-Probst D; Rupp N; Huellner MW
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):8011-8020. PubMed ID: 33768288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative
Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sequential deep learning image enhancement models improve diagnostic confidence, lesion detectability, and image reconstruction time in PET.
Dedja M; Mehranian A; Bradley KM; Walker MD; Fielding PA; Wollenweber SD; Johnsen R; McGowan DR
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):28. PubMed ID: 38488923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on image quality in novel digital PET/CT: clinical implications for the assessment of lung tumors.
Messerli M; Stolzmann P; Egger-Sigg M; Trinckauf J; D'Aguanno S; Burger IA; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Sep; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 30255439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET.
Ahn S; Ross SG; Asma E; Miao J; Jin X; Cheng L; Wollenweber SD; Manjeshwar RM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5733-51. PubMed ID: 26158503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for imaging the in vivo yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization.
Elschot M; Vermolen BJ; Lam MG; de Keizer B; van den Bosch MA; de Jong HW
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55742. PubMed ID: 23405207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of different image reconstructions on PET quantification in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Messerli M; Kotasidis F; Burger IA; Ferraro DA; Muehlematter UJ; Weyermann C; Kenkel D; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180792. PubMed ID: 30673302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deep learning-based time-of-flight (ToF) image enhancement of non-ToF PET scans.
Mehranian A; Wollenweber SD; Walker MD; Bradley KM; Fielding PA; Huellner M; Kotasidis F; Su KH; Johnsen R; Jansen FP; McGowan DR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3740-3749. PubMed ID: 35507059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. BSREM for Brain Metastasis Detection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Lung Cancer Patients.
Liberini V; Pizzuto DA; Messerli M; Orita E; Grünig H; Maurer A; Mader C; Husmann L; Deandreis D; Kotasidis F; Trinckauf J; Curioni A; Opitz I; Winklhofer S; Huellner MW
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):581-593. PubMed ID: 35212859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
