These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Impact of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on quantitative and qualitative aspects for pulmonary nodule detection in digital 2-[ Lohaus N; Enderlin F; Skawran S; Maurer A; Abukwaik AMA; Franzen D; Huellner MW; Messerli M Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8308. PubMed ID: 35585129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals. Lantos J; Mittra ES; Levin CS; Iagaru A Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 29755844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters. Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [ Liberini V; Messerli M; Husmann L; Kudura K; Grünig H; Maurer A; Skawran S; Orita E; Pizzuto DA; Deandreis D; Dummer R; Mangana J; Mihic-Probst D; Rupp N; Huellner MW Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):8011-8020. PubMed ID: 33768288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sequential deep learning image enhancement models improve diagnostic confidence, lesion detectability, and image reconstruction time in PET. Dedja M; Mehranian A; Bradley KM; Walker MD; Fielding PA; Wollenweber SD; Johnsen R; McGowan DR EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):28. PubMed ID: 38488923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A multicentre comparison of quantitative (90)Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres : The QUEST Phantom Study. Willowson KP; Tapner M; ; Bailey DL Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1202-22. PubMed ID: 25967868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y. Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection. Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study. Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deep learning-based time-of-flight (ToF) image enhancement of non-ToF PET scans. Mehranian A; Wollenweber SD; Walker MD; Bradley KM; Fielding PA; Huellner M; Kotasidis F; Su KH; Johnsen R; Jansen FP; McGowan DR Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3740-3749. PubMed ID: 35507059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for imaging the in vivo yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization. Elschot M; Vermolen BJ; Lam MG; de Keizer B; van den Bosch MA; de Jong HW PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55742. PubMed ID: 23405207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. BSREM for Brain Metastasis Detection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Lung Cancer Patients. Liberini V; Pizzuto DA; Messerli M; Orita E; Grünig H; Maurer A; Mader C; Husmann L; Deandreis D; Kotasidis F; Trinckauf J; Curioni A; Opitz I; Winklhofer S; Huellner MW J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):581-593. PubMed ID: 35212859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A novel figure of merit to investigate Santoro M; Della Gala G; Paolani G; Zagni F; Civollani S; Strolin S; Strigari L Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102523. PubMed ID: 36641902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved [ Li L; Chen R; Wen J; Yang X; Hu D; Sun H; Ge Q; Ng YL; Zhou Y; Wan L; Chen Y; Wei W; Liu J Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Aug; 13(8):5230-5241. PubMed ID: 37581091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of Yang FJ; Ai SY; Wu R; Lv Y; Xie HF; Dong Y; Meng QL; Wang F Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201356. PubMed ID: 33571001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]