These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30994070)

  • 1. Do Community Treatment Orders in Psychiatry Stand Up to Principalism: Considerations Reflected through the Prism of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Newton-Howes G
    J Law Med Ethics; 2019 Mar; 47(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 30994070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the Pragmatic Definition? The Right to Non-discrimination of Persons with Disabilities in the Context of Coercive Interventions.
    Gurbai S
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):279-292. PubMed ID: 32669807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grounding the right to live in the community (CRPD Article 19) in the capabilities approach to social justice.
    Wynne Bannister E; Venkatapuram S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 69():101551. PubMed ID: 32241458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiences of involuntary psychiatric admission decision-making: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the perspectives of service users, informal carers, and professionals.
    Sugiura K; Pertega E; Holmberg C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 73():101645. PubMed ID: 33246221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].
    Müller S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Aug; 86(8):485-492. PubMed ID: 30125919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coercive care and human rights; a complex juxtaposition - part 1.
    Little JD
    Australas Psychiatry; 2019 Oct; 27(5):435-437. PubMed ID: 31107099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beneficial Coercion in Psychiatric Care: Insights from African Ethico-Cultural System.
    Ewuoso CO
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Jun; 18(2):91-97. PubMed ID: 27990738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human rights framework: An ethical imperative for psychiatry.
    Gill NS
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2019 Jan; 53(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 30404551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coercive interventions under the new Dutch mental health law: Towards a CRPD-compliant law?
    Alexandrov NV; Schuck N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101685. PubMed ID: 33735651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?
    Prinsen EJ; van Delden JJ
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19103948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].
    Scholten M; Gather J; Vollmann J
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Nov; 93(11):1093-1103. PubMed ID: 36121451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.
    Morrissey F
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Dec; 19(5):423-40. PubMed ID: 23198484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the impact of revised mental health legislation on human rights in Queensland, Australia.
    Gill NS; Amos A; Muhsen H; Hatton J; Ekanayake C; Kisely S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 73():101634. PubMed ID: 33068843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who controls your future: The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities from a service user focused perspective.
    Newton-Howes G; Gordon S
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2020 Feb; 54(2):134-137. PubMed ID: 31823649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UK Government should withdraw from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Gosney P; Bartlett P
    Br J Psychiatry; 2020 Jun; 216(6):296-300. PubMed ID: 31409438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Davidson L
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):163-178. PubMed ID: 32669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canada Should Retain Its Reservation on the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Dufour M; Hastings T; O'Reilly R
    Can J Psychiatry; 2018 Dec; 63(12):809-812. PubMed ID: 29925272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics of Coercive Treatment and Misuse of Psychiatry.
    Steinert T
    Psychiatr Serv; 2017 Mar; 68(3):291-294. PubMed ID: 27691377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Against a singular understanding of legal capacity: Criminal responsibility and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Craigie J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():6-14. PubMed ID: 25997381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: More Than Just Another Reform of Psychiatry.
    Russo J; Wooley S
    Health Hum Rights; 2020 Jun; 22(1):151-161. PubMed ID: 32669797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.