These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30995266)

  • 1. Infectivity enhances prediction of viral cascades in Twitter.
    Li W; Cranmer SJ; Zheng Z; Mucha PJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214453. PubMed ID: 30995266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User emotion for modeling retweeting behaviors.
    Chen J; Liu Y; Zou M
    Neural Netw; 2017 Dec; 96():11-21. PubMed ID: 28946003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size.
    Juul JL; Ugander J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Nov; 118(46):. PubMed ID: 34750252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading?
    Liang H; Fung IC; Tse ZTH; Yin J; Chan CH; Pechta LE; Smith BJ; Marquez-Lameda RD; Meltzer MI; Lubell KM; Fu KW
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):438. PubMed ID: 31023299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normative Mechanism of Rumor Dissemination on Twitter.
    Lee H; Oh HJ
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Mar; 20(3):164-171. PubMed ID: 28263685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion.
    Törnberg P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203958. PubMed ID: 30235239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: An experiment using Twitter bots.
    Mønsted B; Sapieżyński P; Ferrara E; Lehmann S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184148. PubMed ID: 28937984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion size and structural virality: The effects of message and network features on spreading health information on twitter.
    Meng J; Peng W; Tan PN; Liu W; Cheng Y; Bae A
    Comput Human Behav; 2018 Dec; 89():111-120. PubMed ID: 32288177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spreading of misinformation online.
    Del Vicario M; Bessi A; Zollo F; Petroni F; Scala A; Caldarelli G; Stanley HE; Quattrociocchi W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 26729863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Realistic modelling of information spread using peer-to-peer diffusion patterns.
    Zhou B; Pei S; Muchnik L; Meng X; Xu X; Sela A; Havlin S; Stanley HE
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Nov; 4(11):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 32860013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Engagement with health agencies on twitter.
    Bhattacharya S; Srinivasan P; Polgreen P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112235. PubMed ID: 25379727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles.
    Alperin JP; Gomez CJ; Haustein S
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 29607775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rumor diffusion and convergence during the 3.11 earthquake: a twitter case study.
    Takayasu M; Sato K; Sano Y; Yamada K; Miura W; Takayasu H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121443. PubMed ID: 25831122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "We definitely need an audience": experiences of Twitter, Twitter networks and tweet content in adults with severe communication disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
    Hemsley B; Dann S; Palmer S; Allan M; Balandin S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(17):1531-42. PubMed ID: 26030339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social media and flu: Media Twitter accounts as agenda setters.
    Yun GW; Morin D; Park S; Joa CY; Labbe B; Lim J; Lee S; Hyun D
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jul; 91():67-73. PubMed ID: 27185510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twitter use in scientific communication revealed by visualization of information spreading by influencers within half a year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Tsubokura M; Onoue Y; Torii HA; Suda S; Mori K; Nishikawa Y; Ozaki A; Uno K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203594. PubMed ID: 30192829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting the influence of spreading in social networks with excitable sensor networks.
    Pei S; Tang S; Zheng Z
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0124848. PubMed ID: 25950181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of Twitter for infectious diseases clinicians: useful or a waste of time?
    Goff DA; Kullar R; Newland JG
    Clin Infect Dis; 2015 May; 60(10):1533-40. PubMed ID: 25652087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diffusion of Messages from an Electronic Cigarette Brand to Potential Users through Twitter.
    Chu KH; Unger JB; Allem JP; Pattarroyo M; Soto D; Cruz TB; Yang H; Jiang L; Yang CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145387. PubMed ID: 26684746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Why We Retweet scale.
    Majmundar A; Allem JP; Boley Cruz T; Unger JB
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206076. PubMed ID: 30335827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.