These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding solution and its prevention. Oie S; Kamiya A; Hironaga K; Koshiro A Am J Infect Control; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 1524268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of the risk of contamination of enteral nutrition bottles based on the simulation of home use conditions and hygiene procedures. da Silva ITF; Medeiros CO; Leobet J; Beux MR; Rabito EI; Etgeton SAP; Fiori LS Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Aug; 39(4):873-880. PubMed ID: 38491970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microbiological quality of enteral feeding and infant formula produced in dietary units, according to the triad of Donabedian. da Silva Santos AC; Coelho Araújo WM; C de A Akutsu Rde C; Haack de Arruda A Nutr Hosp; 2015 May; 31(5):2122-30. PubMed ID: 25929383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding solutions in a community hospital. Schroeder P; Fisher D; Volz M; Paloucek J JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1983; 7(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 6413713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The relationship between enteral formula contamination and length of enteral delivery set usage. Kohn CL JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1991; 15(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 1942473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of two-liter prepacked enteral diet delivery system: a controlled trial. Rees RG; Ryan J; Attrill HA; Silk DB JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1988; 12(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 3134560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a closed enteral feeding system under cyclic feeding conditions: a microbial and cost evaluation. Moffitt SK; Gohman SM; Sass KM; Faucher KJ Nutrition; 1997; 13(7-8):622-8. PubMed ID: 9263253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bacterial safety of a closed-administration system for enteral nutrition solutions. Vaughan LA; Manore M; Winston DH J Am Diet Assoc; 1988 Jan; 88(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 3121714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Formula contamination as a potential cause of diarrhea in tube-fed patients. Kohn CL Am J Med; 1991 Jan; 90(1):139-40. PubMed ID: 1898837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbial contamination of enteral feeds. Chantrakooptungool S; Rahule S; Saksangounmanoon S; Surapatana N J Med Assoc Thai; 1989 Jul; 72 Suppl 2():15-9. PubMed ID: 2504866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microbiological evaluation of four enteral feeding systems which have been deliberately subjected to faulty handling procedures. Beattie TK; Anderton A J Hosp Infect; 1999 May; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 10363206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frequency of changing enteral alimentation bags and tubing, and adverse clinical outcomes in patients in a long term care facility. Graham S; McIntyre M; Chicoine J; Gerard B; Laughren R; Cowley G; Morrison J; Aoki FY; Nicolle LE Can J Infect Control; 1993; 8(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 8400342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Bacteriological safety of enteral nutrition with continuous delivery]. Bengoa JM; Hyde AL; Ducel G; Loizeau E Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jun; 115(26):903-6. PubMed ID: 3927480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A microbiologic study of enteral feeding hang time in a burn hospital: can feeding costs be reduced without compromising patient safety? Neely AN; Mayes T; Gardner J; Kagan RJ; Gottschlich MM Nutr Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 21(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 17119167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]