129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30997729)
1. Impact of treatment planning using a structure block function on the target and organ doses related to patient movement in cervical esophageal cancer: A phantom study.
Shimizu H; Sasaki K; Ito M; Aoyama T; Tachibana H; Tomita N; Makita C; Tanaka H; Koide Y; Iwata T; Kodaira T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):75-83. PubMed ID: 30997729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of virtual block objects in reducing the lung dose in helical tomotherapy planning for cervical oesophageal cancer: a planning study.
Ito M; Shimizu H; Aoyama T; Tachibana H; Tomita N; Makita C; Koide Y; Kato D; Ishiguchi T; Kodaira T
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):62. PubMed ID: 29618353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beamlet based direct aperture optimization for MERT using a photon MLC.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Joosten A; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Chatelain C; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121711. PubMed ID: 25471958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Earl M; Yu C
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3448-54. PubMed ID: 16370431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT stereotactic body radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation for a real-time SBRT treatment planning and delivery program.
Dunlap N; McIntosh A; Sheng K; Yang W; Turner B; Shoushtari A; Sheehan J; Jones DR; Lu W; Ruchala K; Olivera G; Parnell D; Larner JL; Benedict SH; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 21055611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of tumor location on the intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan of helical tomotherapy.
Xu Y; Yan H; Hu Z; Ma P; Men K; Huang P; Ren W; Dai J; Li Y
Med Dosim; 2017 Winter; 42(4):334-340. PubMed ID: 28797719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric verification of surface and superficial doses for head and neck IMRT with different PTV shrinkage margins.
Shiau AC; Lai PL; Liang JA; Shueng PW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1435-43. PubMed ID: 21520855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.
Martin S; Chen JZ; Rashid Dar A; Yartsev S
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 21962823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of CT contrast on volumetric arc therapy planning (RapidArc and helical tomotherapy) for head and neck cancer.
Liu AJ; Vora N; Suh S; Liu A; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25242679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive volumetric modulated arc treatment planning for esophageal cancers using cone beam computed tomography.
Sriram P; Syamkumar SA; Kumar JS; Prabakar S; Dhanabalan R; Vivekanandan N
Phys Med; 2012 Oct; 28(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 22079402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of concurrent treatment with the scanning ultrasound reflector linear array system (SURLAS) and the helical tomotherapy system.
Peñagarícano JA; Moros E; Novák P; Yan Y; Corry P
Int J Hyperthermia; 2008 Aug; 24(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 18608592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new Monte Carlo-based treatment plan optimization approach for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Li Y; Tian Z; Shi F; Song T; Wu Z; Liu Y; Jiang S; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):2903-19. PubMed ID: 25776792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 4D VMAT planning and verification technique for dynamic tracking using a direct aperture deformation (DAD) method.
Zhang Y; Yang Y; Fu W; Li X; Li T; Heron DE; Huq MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):50-61. PubMed ID: 28300367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of robust optimization plan with partial-arc VMAT for photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A phantom study.
Miura H; Ozawa S; Nagata Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):97-103. PubMed ID: 28691343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of hybrid TomoHelical- and TomoDirect-based volumetric gradient matching technique for total body irradiation.
Hong CS; Kim MJ; Kim J; Chang KH; Park K; Kim DW; Han MC; Yoon HI; Kim JS; Lee H
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):233. PubMed ID: 31856870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
