These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998072)

  • 41. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43101. PubMed ID: 22952636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
    Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Individual differences in working memory capacity, attention control, fluid intelligence, and pupillary measures of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1296-1310. PubMed ID: 35389696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Linking the dynamics of cognitive control to individual differences in working memory capacity: Evidence from reaching behavior.
    Erb CD; Welhaf MS; Smeekens BA; Moreau D; Kane MJ; Marcovitch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1383-1402. PubMed ID: 34197169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic memory: examining the importance of encoding specificity.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21912997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):525-549. PubMed ID: 22004270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence?
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Souza AS; von Bastian CC; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1335-1372. PubMed ID: 30958017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 25436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.
    Mall JT; Morey CC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52806. PubMed ID: 23326359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Nöstl A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 23479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What can half a million change detection trials tell us about visual working memory?
    Balaban H; Fukuda K; Luria R
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103984. PubMed ID: 31234117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 19210090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.
    Tsuchida Y; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22484011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
    Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Aiding the search: Examining individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving.
    Ellis DM; Brewer GA
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jul; 62():21-33. PubMed ID: 29723709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.
    Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of working memory capacity in cardiovascular monitoring of cognitive workload.
    Jóhannsdóttir KR; Magnúsdóttir EH; Sigurjónsdóttir S; Guðnason J
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():154-163. PubMed ID: 29269026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Working memory capacity modulates task performance but has little influence on task choice.
    Butler KM; Arrington CM; Weywadt C
    Mem Cognit; 2011 May; 39(4):708-24. PubMed ID: 21264582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.