207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998280)
1. Changing the Question.
Brudney D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Mar; 49(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 30998280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment.
Johansson M; Broström L
Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Better Guidance for Surrogates.
Kaebnick GE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Mar; 49(2):2. PubMed ID: 30998278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look.
Johansson M; Broström L
Bioethics; 2011 Jun; 25(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 19874290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.
Torke AM; Alexander GC; Lantos J
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1514-7. PubMed ID: 18618201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social media as a contributor to substituted judgment: the hazards outweigh the value.
Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 22974035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Turning failures into successes: a methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.
Johansson M; Broström L
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18392948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.
Pope TM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Tsai NT
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?
Moore JA; Gallagher CM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Status update: the complexities of the internet age bring urgency for deliberately making advance health care decision wishes known.
Siess S; Moyer A
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 22974037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Burke TB
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.
Wahlert L
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "What the patient would have decided": a fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard.
Broström L; Johansson M; Nielsen MK
Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Sep; 10(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 17120112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.
Feltz A; Abt T
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age".
Berg J
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22974042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new standard for incapacitated patient decision making: the clinical standard of surrogate empowerment.
Tunzi M
J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(4):316-30. PubMed ID: 23469692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precommitment: a misguided strategy for securing death with dignity.
Dresser R
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1823-47. PubMed ID: 15478265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision making by surrogates.
Day LJ
Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11873744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigating Tensions Between Law and Ethics in Surrogate Decision Making.
Nelson RH
Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jul; 24(7):127-128. PubMed ID: 38913458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
