271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998547)
1. Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.
Souza P; Arehart K; Schoof T; Anderson M; Strori D; Balmert L
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1280-1292. PubMed ID: 30998547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.
Arehart K; Souza P; Kates J; Lunner T; Pedersen MS
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 25985016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.
Arehart KH; Souza P; Baca R; Kates JM
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 23291963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying the Range of Signal Modification in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.
Rallapalli V; Anderson M; Kates J; Balmert L; Sirow L; Arehart K; Souza P
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):433-441. PubMed ID: 31408045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.
Ohlenforst B; Souza PE; MacDonald EN
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 26517451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.
Anderson M; Rallapalli V; Schoof T; Souza P; Arehart K
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):809-815. PubMed ID: 30052097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment.
Rudner M; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 21545768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
