BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998549)

  • 1. The Use of Static and Dynamic Cues for Vowel Identification by Children Wearing Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.
    Hedrick M; Thornton KET; Yeager K; Plyler P; Johnstone P; Reilly K; Springer C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 30998549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual development of nasal consonants in children with normal hearing and in children who use cochlear implants.
    Guillot KM; Ohde RN; Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1133-43. PubMed ID: 23785183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Tye-Murray N; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children.
    Verhoeven J; Hide O; De Maeyer S; Gillis S; Gillis S
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 59():24-39. PubMed ID: 26629749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel Production in Prelingually Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):664-682. PubMed ID: 33524265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel production in hearing impaired children: A comparison between normal-hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear-implanted children.
    Núñez-Batalla F; Vasile G; Cartón-Corona N; Pedregal-Mallo D; Menéndez de Castro M; Guntín García M; Gómez-Martínez J; Carro Fernández P; Llorente-Pendás JL
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 70(5):251-257. PubMed ID: 30086890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaction time for correct identification of vowels in consonant-vowel syllables and of vowel segments.
    Hedrick M; Thornton K
    JASA Express Lett; 2024 Jan; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 38214609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasal/Oral Vowel Perception in French-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Typical Hearing.
    Fagniart S; Delvaux V; Harmegnies B; Huberlant A; Huet K; Piccaluga M; Watterman I; Charlier B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Apr; 67(4):1243-1267. PubMed ID: 38457658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P; Smith CA; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Point vowel duration in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants at 4 and 5 years of age.
    VanDam M; Ide-Helvie D; Moeller MP
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Aug; 25(8):689-704. PubMed ID: 21456950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.