These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998622)
1. Value-based Health Care: Moving Beyond "Minimum Clinically Important Difference" to a Tiered System of Evaluating Successful Clinical Outcomes. Bernstein DN; Nwachukwu BU; Bozic KJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):945-947. PubMed ID: 30998622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How are we measuring clinically important outcome for operative treatments in sports medicine? Nwachukwu BU; Runyon RS; Kahlenberg CA; Gausden EB; Schairer WW; Allen AA Phys Sportsmed; 2017 May; 45(2):159-164. PubMed ID: 28276990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Faceoff: How Does Patient Satisfaction Fit Into the Value Equation? Delanois RE; Mont MA; Huddleston JI Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):21-24. PubMed ID: 29389756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality, Safety, Value: From Theory to Practice Management What Should We Measure? Shore BJ; Murphy RF; Hogue GD J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(5 Suppl 1):S61-6. PubMed ID: 26049309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. Graham B; Green A; James M; Katz J; Swiontkowski M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jan; 97(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 25568398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Dimension of the Press Ganey Survey Most Important in Evaluating Patient Satisfaction in the Academic Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery Setting. Martinez JR; Nakonezny PA; Batty M; Wells J Orthopedics; 2019 Jul; 42(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 31323103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The presence of residents during orthopedic operation exerts no negative influence on outcome. Giordano L; Oliviero A; Peretti GM; Maffulli N Br Med Bull; 2019 Jun; 130(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 31049559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database. Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of patient satisfaction when office-based procedures are performed by general surgery residents versus an attending surgeon. Wojcik BM; McKinley SK; Amari N; Chang DC; Wachtel H; Petrusa E; Mullen JT; Phitayakorn R Surgery; 2019 Jul; 166(1):116-122. PubMed ID: 30952442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction at and after discharge. Effect of a time lag. Stevens M; Reininga IH; Boss NA; van Horn JR Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Feb; 60(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 16253466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based orthopedic surgery: is it possible? Suk M; Hanson B; Helfet DL Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 20399353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Expectation Game: Patient Comprehension Is a Determinant of Outcome. Rossi MJ; Brand JC; Provencher MT; Lubowitz JH Arthroscopy; 2015 Dec; 31(12):2283-4. PubMed ID: 26652147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient Satisfaction: Inception, Impact, and Correlation with Outcomes. Khanna K; Diab M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(21):e115. PubMed ID: 31567669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]