These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30998831)

  • 1. Variation in target and distractor heterogeneity impacts performance in the centroid task.
    Lu VT; Wright CE; Chubb C; Sperling G
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):21. PubMed ID: 30998831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A triple dissociation between learning of target, distractors, and spatial contexts.
    Le Dantec CC; Melton EE; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22306889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human attention filters for single colors.
    Sun P; Chubb C; Wright CE; Sperling G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(43):E6712-E6720. PubMed ID: 27791040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal dissociation between category-based and item-based processes in rejecting distractors.
    Ariga A; Watanabe K
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 18324414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The centroid paradigm: Quantifying feature-based attention in terms of attention filters.
    Sun P; Chubb C; Wright CE; Sperling G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):474-515. PubMed ID: 26552652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
    Tong Y; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of distractors in object substitution masking.
    Camp SJ; Pilling M; Argyropoulos I; Gellatly A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):940-57. PubMed ID: 25915070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is attention essential for inducing synesthetic colors? Evidence from oculomotor distractors.
    Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):21.1-9. PubMed ID: 19761312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [DYNAMICS OF GAZE FIXATION DURATION AND EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS WHILE PRESENTATION FADING-IN IMAGES AND DISTRACTORS].
    Koltunova TI; Podladchikova LN; Shaposhnikov DG; Vladimirski BM; Syrkin LD; Kruchkov BI; Usov VM
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2015 Oct; 101(10):1202-12. PubMed ID: 26827499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency.
    Tsvetanov KA; Mevorach C; Allen H; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1382-94. PubMed ID: 23812959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search and the N2pc in children.
    Couperus JW; Quirk C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 25678274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orientation categories used in guidance of attention in visual search can differ in strength.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2246-2256. PubMed ID: 28733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
    Tsal Y; Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.