BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30999795)

  • 1. Surgical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: what role can an independent abortion service provider play?
    Callaby H; Fisher J; Lohr PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 39(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 30999795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
    Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.
    Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
    BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meeting women's need for a flexible abortion service: retrospective study of a specialist day-care unit.
    Lowy A; Ojo R; Stegeman A; Vellacott I
    J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 9923953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Client preferences and acceptability for medical abortion and MVA as early pregnancy termination method in northwest Ethiopia.
    Woldetsadik MA; Sendekie TY; White MT; Zegeye DT
    Reprod Health; 2011 Jun; 8():19. PubMed ID: 21639888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.
    Slade P; Heke S; Fletcher J; Stewart P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Dec; 105(12):1288-95. PubMed ID: 9883920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision satisfaction among women choosing a method of pregnancy termination in the setting of fetal anomalies and other pregnancy complications: A qualitative study.
    Kerns JL; Light A; Dalton V; McNamara B; Steinauer J; Kuppermann M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Oct; 101(10):1859-1864. PubMed ID: 29980336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial.
    Howie FL; Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):829-33. PubMed ID: 9236649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of health professionals' views on acceptable gestational age and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly.
    Crowe L; Graham RH; Robson SC; Rankin J
    Eur J Med Genet; 2018 Sep; 61(9):493-498. PubMed ID: 29777898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accessing medical and surgical first-trimester abortion services: women's experiences and costs from an operations research study in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.
    Lince-Deroche N; Fetters T; Sinanovic E; Blanchard K
    Contraception; 2017 Aug; 96(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 28390854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acceptability and clinical outcomes of first- and second-trimester surgical abortion by suction aspiration in Colombia.
    DePiñeres T; Baum S; Grossman D
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 24939803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly after 23 weeks of gestation: a European register-based study.
    Garne E; Khoshnood B; Loane M; Boyd P; Dolk H;
    BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 20374608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How can patient experience of abortion care be improved? Evidence from the SACHA study.
    Lewandowska M; Scott R; Meiksin R; Reiter J; Salaria N; Lohr PA; Cameron S; Palmer M; French RS; Wellings K;
    Womens Health (Lond); 2024; 20():17455057241242675. PubMed ID: 38794997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gynaecologists' abortion practice.
    Francome C; Savage WD
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Feb; 99(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 1554669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcomes and Women's Experiences before and after the Introduction of Mifepristone into Second-Trimester Medical Abortion Services in South Africa.
    Constant D; Harries J; Malaba T; Myer L; Patel M; Petro G; Grossman D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161843. PubMed ID: 27583448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paracervical block as pain treatment during second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: an RCT with bupivacaine versus sodium chloride.
    Andersson IM; Benson L; Christensson K; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 26573530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's satisfaction with medical termination.
    Maaita ME; Prasarman C; Smith J; Neale EJ
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Apr; 25(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10228242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal Limits Relaxed: Time to Look at Other Barriers Faced by Women Seeking Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomalies.
    Singla R; Banu NT; Arora A; Aggarwal N; Gupta M
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e34144. PubMed ID: 36843792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demographic, Clinical, and Counseling Factors Associated with the Selection of Pregnancy Termination Method in the Second Trimester for Fetal and Pregnancy Anomalies.
    Maistrellis E; Janiak E; Hammel R; Hurwitz S; Delli-Bovi L; Bartz D
    Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(4):349-355. PubMed ID: 31085003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
    Cameron ST; Glasier AF; Logan J; Benton L; Baird DT
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 8968240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.