These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31001162)

  • 1. Editorial: What's Shared in Sharing Tasks and Actions? Processes and Representations Underlying Joint Performance.
    Yamaguchi M; Welsh TN; Klauer KC; Dittrich K
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():659. PubMed ID: 31001162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's Shared in Movement Kinematics: Investigating Co-representation of Actions Through Movement.
    Rocca M; Cavallo A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1578. PubMed ID: 30210406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():113-120. PubMed ID: 28535468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharing a mental number line across individuals? The role of body position and empathy in joint numerical cognition.
    Hartmann M; Fischer MH; Mast FW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1732-1740. PubMed ID: 30304994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2017 Nov; 81(6):1166-1177. PubMed ID: 27744585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together.
    Sebanz N; Bekkering H; Knoblich G
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Feb; 10(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 16406326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.
    Vesper C; Abramova E; Bütepage J; Ciardo F; Crossey B; Effenberg A; Hristova D; Karlinsky A; McEllin L; Nijssen SR; Schmitz L; Wahn B
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2039. PubMed ID: 28101077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group benefits in joint perceptual tasks-a review.
    Wahn B; Kingstone A; König P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29754443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.
    Arrington CM; Altmann EM; Carr TH
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jul; 31(5):781-9. PubMed ID: 12956242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of verbal joint action: ERPs reveal common perception and action systems in a shared-Stroop task.
    Demiral ŞB; Gambi C; Nieuwland MS; Pickering MJ
    Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 1649(Pt A):79-89. PubMed ID: 27553631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():184-192. PubMed ID: 30340087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action.
    Botvinick M; Plaut DC
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):298-311. PubMed ID: 12466927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task.
    van der Weiden A; Liepelt R; van Haren NEM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):842-851. PubMed ID: 28840393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group membership and social status modulate joint actions.
    Aquino A; Paolini D; Pagliaro S; Migliorati D; Wolff A; Alparone FR; Costantini M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2461-6. PubMed ID: 26003126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of Social Interaction: Kinematic Analysis of a Joint Action.
    Moreau Q; Galvan L; Nazir TA; Paulignan Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2016. PubMed ID: 28082939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
    Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1158-1176. PubMed ID: 28689319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.