These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31002709)

  • 21. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices.
    Harris G; Farley S; Russell GJ; Butler MJ; Selinger J
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e227. PubMed ID: 24392290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models.
    Murphy SM; Wilckens DT; Augustine BC; Peyton MA; Harper GC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4590. PubMed ID: 30872785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears.
    Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies.
    Haddad NM; Hudgens B; Damiani C; Gross K; Kuefler D; Pollock K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):929-40. PubMed ID: 18477025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimizing the size of the area surveyed for monitoring a Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Swiss Alps by means of photographic capture-recapture.
    Zimmermann F; Breitenmoser-Würsten C; Molinari-Jobin A; Breitenmoser U
    Integr Zool; 2013 Sep; 8(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 24020463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating population size with noninvasive capture-mark-recapture data.
    Petit E; Valiere N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):1062-73. PubMed ID: 16922223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency.
    Tenan S; Pedrini P; Bragalanti N; Groff C; Sutherland C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185588. PubMed ID: 28973034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?
    Tourani M; Dupont P; Nawaz MA; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2020 Jul; 101(7):e03030. PubMed ID: 32112415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling.
    Karanth KU; Nichols JD; Kumar NS; Hines JE
    Ecology; 2006 Nov; 87(11):2925-37. PubMed ID: 17168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.
    Fuller AK; Sutherland CS; Royle JA; Hare MP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 27509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing bias in demographic estimates from joint live and dead encounter models.
    Weegman MD; Wilson S; Alisauskas RT; Kellett DK
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9382. PubMed ID: 32612891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inferring invasive species abundance using removal data from management actions.
    Davis AJ; Hooten MB; Miller RS; Farnsworth ML; Lewis J; Moxcey M; Pepin KM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 27755739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.