121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31003329)
1. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
Kang YJ; Frank JF
J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
Kang YJ; Frank JF
J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Airborne Microflora Collected by the Andersen Sieve Sampler and RCS Sampler in a Dairy Processing Plant.
Kang YJ; Frank JF
J Food Prot; 1989 Dec; 52(12):877-880. PubMed ID: 31003361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.
Aizenberg V; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K
AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of particulate air samplers for airborne aflatoxin B1.
Silas JC; Harrison MA; Carpenter JA
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1986; 18(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 3086563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collection efficiencies of aerosol samplers for virus-containing aerosols.
Tseng CC; Li CS
J Aerosol Sci; 2005; 36(5):593-607. PubMed ID: 32287372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
Zimmerman NJ; Reist PC; Turner AG
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies.
Schuit M; Gardner S; Taylor J; Dabisch P
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009001. PubMed ID: 33524051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols. Part I. Denuder--cascade impactor sampler.
Dahlin J; Spanne M; Karlsson D; Dalene M; Skarping G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul; 52(5):361-74. PubMed ID: 18458354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
Yao M; Mainelis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
Casewell MW; Fermie PG; Thomas C; Simmons NA
J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of biological aerosols in dairy processing plants.
Kang YJ; Frank JF
J Dairy Sci; 1990 Mar; 73(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 2187913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of samplers collecting airborne influenza viruses: 1. Primarily impingers and cyclones.
Raynor PC; Adesina A; Aboubakr HA; Yang M; Torremorell M; Goyal SM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244977. PubMed ID: 33507951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA
Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).
Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Wang W; Fabri T; Groot Koerkamp PW; de Jong MC
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 25292111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personal air samplers for measuring occupational exposures to biological hazards.
Macher JM; First MW
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 6702610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance characteristics of PM10 samplers under calm air conditions.
Lai CY; Chen CC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):578-87. PubMed ID: 10786010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
