These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31003361)

  • 1. Comparison of Airborne Microflora Collected by the Andersen Sieve Sampler and RCS Sampler in a Dairy Processing Plant.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Dec; 52(12):877-880. PubMed ID: 31003361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of Airborne Contamination in Two Commercial Ice Cream Plants.
    Ren TJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1992 Jan; 55(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 31071796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air sampling in hospitals.
    Gröschel DH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 353():230-40. PubMed ID: 6939388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Survey of Four Fluid Milk Processing Plants for Airborne Contamination Using Various Sampling Methods.
    Ren TJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1992 Jan; 55(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 31071805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
    Bellin P; Schillinger J
    Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of biological aerosols in dairy processing plants.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Mar; 73(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 2187913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
    Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
    Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Andersen viable impactor for single stage sampling.
    Jones W; Morring K; Morey P; Sorenson W
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 May; 46(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 4003283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
    Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media.
    Smid T; Schokkin E; Boleij JS; Heederik D
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 2729098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mould propagules in houses. A field comparison of selected techniques.
    Verhoeff AP; van Wijnen JH; Boleij JS; Brunekreef B; van Reenen-Hoekstra ES; Samson RA
    Allergy; 1990 May; 45(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 2382792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
    Casewell MW; Fermie PG; Thomas C; Simmons NA
    J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.
    Mehta SK; Bell-Robinson DM; Groves TO; Stetzenbach LD; Pierson DL
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 11192219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Bacterial and fungal aerosols in the work environment of cleaners].
    Gołofit-Szymczak M; Górny RL; Ławniczek-Wałczyk A; Cyprowski M; Stobnicka A
    Med Pr; 2015; 66(6):779-91. PubMed ID: 26674165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.