180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31004589)
21. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Postoperative stability after setback of sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison of three techniques.
Byeon KS; Lee YJ; Yoon YJ; Hong SM; Park YH; Choi DJ; Park JW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 23083507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography.
Jung YJ; Kim MJ; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):763-771.e8. PubMed ID: 19272814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Postoperative changes in mandibular position after mandibular setback surgery via the surgery-first approach in relation to the increase of vertical dimension and the amount of mandibular setback.
Han JJ; Chong JH; Ryu SY; Oh HK; Park HJ; Jung S; Kook MS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Dec; 122(6):666-671. PubMed ID: 27717716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry.
Ohba S; Nakao N; Kawasaki T; Miura KI; Minamizato T; Koga Y; Yoshida N; Asahina I
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 54(8):920-926. PubMed ID: 27372232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of rigid fixation on orthodontic finishing after mandibular bilateral sagittal split setback: the case for miniplate monocortical fixation.
Cho HJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e310-21. PubMed ID: 22197006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early and 1-year postsurgical stability and its factors in patients with complicated skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion treated by conventional and surgery-first approach: A prospective cohort study.
Jiang Y; Yang Z; Qi Y; Peng J; Li Z; Liu X; Yi B; Wang X; Chen G; Han B; Xu T; Jiang R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):728-740. PubMed ID: 37516951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.
Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism.
Kawamata A; Fujishita M; Ariji Y; Ariji E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 10710450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical Stability After Proximal Segment Angle Alteration in Patients With Class III Facial Asymmetry.
Lee SF; Chen YA; Lin CH; Wen-Ching Ko E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jun; 81(6):734-745. PubMed ID: 37011882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka W; Rahal A; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 62(12):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15573348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.
Kim YJ; Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim SJ; Kim M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 24071374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A surgery-first approach using single-jaw rotational mandibular setback in low-angle mandibular prognathism.
Kim GS; Lim SH; Jeong SR; Park JH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):617-628. PubMed ID: 34274200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Postsurgical changes of mandible based on vertical dimension increase in Skeletal Class III deformities.
Aljawad H; Kook MS; Han JJ; Lee KC
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1100-1105. PubMed ID: 33191113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does the amount of mandibular setback during bimaxillary surgery correlate with the degree of surgical relapse?
Takahara N; Kimura A; Tomomatsu N; Nakakuki K; Yoda T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 May; 129(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 32102761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.
Yoo JY; Kwon YD; Suh JH; Ko SJ; Lee B; Lee JW; Kim EC; Girod S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 23538214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
