BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31004589)

  • 41. Does Articular Disc Position Change Following Mandibular Setback Surgery?
    Thamwatharsaree N; Panyarak W; Wantanajittikul K; Yarach U; Tachasuttirut K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Feb; 82(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 37992759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
    Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Postsurgical stability after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation following upper premolar extraction.
    Kim JW; Lee NK; Yun PY; Moon SW; Kim YK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1968.e1-1968.e11. PubMed ID: 23988146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Three-dimensional mandibular change after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a semirigid sliding plate system for fixation of a mandibular setback surgery.
    Ghang MH; Kim HM; You JY; Kim BH; Choi JP; Kim SH; Choung PH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Feb; 115(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 22835657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback?
    Baek SH; Kim TK; Kim MJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16448915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
    Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Stability of extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: plate fixation versus maxillomandibular/skeletal suspension wire fixation.
    Mobarak KA; Krogstad O; Espeland L; Lyberg T
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 11307428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Midfacial Soft Tissue Changes After Maxillary Posterior Impaction and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback in Class III Patients.
    Seo SW; Jung YS; Baik HS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 28(7):1789-1796. PubMed ID: 28834834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
    Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Maintaining the space between the mandibular ramus segments during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy does not influence the stability.
    Vamvanij N; Chinpaisarn C; Denadai R; Seo HJ; Pai BCJ; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 Sep; 120(9):1768-1776. PubMed ID: 33775535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Type of mandibular asymmetry affects changes and outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry.
    Liu LC; Chen YA; Chen RF; Yao CF; Liao YF; Chen YR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1077-1088. PubMed ID: 34338893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of setback Le Fort I osteotomy on midfacial soft-tissue changes as evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography superimposition for cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lee JY; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Park SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 23294855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
    Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.
    Hsu SS; Huang CS; Chen PK; Ko EW; Chen YR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 22129998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correlation between intraoperative proximal segment rotation and post-sagittal split ramus osteotomy relapse: a three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography study.
    Choi BJ; Lee BS; Kwon YD; Lee JW; Yun SU; Ryu KS; Ohe JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 47(5):613-621. PubMed ID: 29146395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
    Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of postoperative, three-dimensional soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusions treated via orthodontics-first and surgery-first approaches.
    Okamoto D; Yamauchi K; Yazaki M; Saito S; Suzuki H; Nogami S; Takahashi T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 49(10):898-904. PubMed ID: 33994293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.