These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31005695)

  • 1. In vitro assessment of connection strength and stability of internal implant-abutment connections.
    Kofron MD; Carstens M; Fu C; Wen HB
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 May; 65():92-99. PubMed ID: 31005695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.
    Bédouin Y; Lefrançois E; Salomon JP; Auroy P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 34238536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical comparison of experimental conical-head abutment screws with conventional flat-head abutment screws for external-hex and internal tri-channel implant connections: an in vitro evaluation of loosening torque.
    Coppedê AR; Faria AC; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Shibli JA; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):e321-9. PubMed ID: 24278937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro assessment of internal implant-abutment connections with different cone angles under static loading using synchrotron-based radiation.
    Angermair J; Iglhaut G; Meyenberg K; Wiest W; Rack A; Zabler S; Fretwurst T; Nelson K; Kernen F
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):396. PubMed ID: 38549137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
    Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading.
    Canullo L; Penarrocha-Oltra D; Soldini C; Mazzocco F; Penarrocha M; Covani U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 24665919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of torque resistance and microgaps between a combined Octatorx-cone connection and an internal hexagon implant-abutment connection.
    Khongkhunthian P; Khongkhunthian S; Weerawatprachya W; Pongpat K; Aunmeungtong W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 25794913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of stiffness of implant-abutment connection on load-deflection ratios of a screw-retained stiff cantilever beam. 3-D measurements in vitro.
    Cassel B; Lundgren D; Karlsson D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22906410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival of Four Conical Implant Abutment Connections After Removal of the Abutment Screw and Simulated Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
    Yao KT; Chang TY; Huang GJ; Fang HW; Wang DH; Hsu ML
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Aug; 49(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 37527179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: In-vitro study.
    Sammour SR; Maamoun El-Sheikh M; Aly El-Gendy A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):e265-e271. PubMed ID: 31427043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection.
    Semper-Hogg W; Kraft S; Stiller S; Mehrhof J; Nelson K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):1017-23. PubMed ID: 22821447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of the Conical Angle Design in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: A Pilot Study Based on the Finite Element Method.
    Yao KT; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Kao HC; Hsu ML
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29090979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axial displacement in cement-retained prostheses with different implant-abutment connections.
    Ko KH; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1098–1104. PubMed ID: 30934038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
    Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments.
    Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal Hexagon vs Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluation of 3-Year Postloading Outcomes.
    Mihali SG; Wang HL; Karancsi O; Bratu EA
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Dec; 47(6):485-490. PubMed ID: 33270835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.