BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31005927)

  • 21. The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Walker JG; Macrae F; Winship I; Oberoi J; Saya S; Milton S; Bickerstaffe A; Dowty JG; De Abreu Lourenço R; Clark M; Galloway L; Fishman G; Walter FM; Flander L; Chondros P; Ait Ouakrim D; Pirotta M; Trevena L; Jenkins MA; Emery JD
    Trials; 2018 Jul; 19(1):397. PubMed ID: 30045764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An electronic family health history tool to identify and manage patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Goldstein KM; Fisher DA; Wu RR; Orlando LA; Coffman CJ; Grubber JM; Rakhra-Burris T; Wang V; Scheuner MT; Sperber N; Datta SK; Nelson RE; Strawbridge E; Provenzale D; Hauser ER; Voils CI
    Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):576. PubMed ID: 31590688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Colorectal screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test kit among the Malaysian cohort participants.
    Abdullah N; Abd Jalal N; Ismail N; Kamaruddin MA; Abd Mutalib NS; Alias MR; Mazlan L; Sagap I; Jamal R
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 65():101656. PubMed ID: 31923638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equivalency of fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer screening.
    Quintero E; Carrillo M; Gimeno-García AZ; Hernández-Guerra M; Nicolás-Pérez D; Alonso-Abreu I; Díez-Fuentes ML; Abraira V
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Nov; 147(5):1021-30.e1; quiz e16-7. PubMed ID: 25127679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three birds with one stone: a protocol for a randomised intervention study to increase participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening among women attending breast cancer screening.
    Helgestad ADL; Larsen MB; Njor S; Tranberg M; Petersen LK; Andersen B
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e062824. PubMed ID: 36137619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adding family history to faecal immunochemical testing increases the detection of advanced neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Kallenberg FG; Vleugels JL; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stegeman I; Stoop EM; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Jul; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27170502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care.
    Saya S; Boyd L; Chondros P; McNamara M; King M; Milton S; Lourenco RA; Clark M; Fishman G; Marker J; Ostroff C; Allman R; Walter FM; Buchanan D; Winship I; McIntosh J; Macrae F; Jenkins M; Emery J
    Trials; 2022 Sep; 23(1):810. PubMed ID: 36163034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy.
    Stegeman I; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ; Fockens P; Kraaijenhagen RA; Bossuyt PM
    Gut; 2014 Mar; 63(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 23964098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increasing uptake of FIT colorectal screening: protocol for the TEMPO randomised controlled trial testing a suggested deadline and a planning tool.
    Robb KA; Kotzur M; Young B; McCowan C; Hollands GJ; Irvine A; Macdonald S; McConnachie A; O'Carroll RE; O'Connor RC; Steele RJC
    BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e066136. PubMed ID: 37202130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The National Cohort of Esophageal Cancer-Prospective Cohort Study of Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions based on High-Risk Population in China (NCEC-HRP): study protocol.
    Chen R; Ma S; Guan C; Song G; Ma Q; Xie S; Wang M; Shao D; Li X; Wei W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e027360. PubMed ID: 30948615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.
    Singal AG; Gupta S; Tiro JA; Skinner CS; McCallister K; Sanders JM; Bishop WP; Agrawal D; Mayorga CA; Ahn C; Loewen AC; Santini NO; Halm EA
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 26535565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disease knowledge, medical experience, health-related quality of life and health-care costs among patients with advanced colorectal cancer in China: protocol for a nationwide multicentre survey.
    Liu Y; Xu HF; Zhang X; Yu YQ; Zhao YQ; Zhang SK; Qiao YL
    BMJ Open; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e054403. PubMed ID: 35264348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.
    Hewitson P; Glasziou P; Irwig L; Towler B; Watson E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; 2007(1):CD001216. PubMed ID: 17253456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results.
    Cai SR; Huang YQ; Zhang SZ; Li QR; Ma XY; Zheng S
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30630450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study.
    Siebenhofer A; Plath J; Taubenroth M; Singer S; Hechtner M; Dahlhaus A; Rauck S; Schulz-Rothe S; Koné I; Gerlach FM
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Aug; 15():605. PubMed ID: 26314581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the effects of a risk-adapted screening program for familial colorectal cancer in individuals between 25 and 50 years of age: study protocol for the prospective population-based intervention study FARKOR.
    Hoffmann S; Crispin A; Lindoerfer D; Sroczynski G; Siebert U; Mansmann U; Consortium F
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 May; 20(1):131. PubMed ID: 32370777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Budget Impact Analysis of Against Colorectal Cancer In Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A Successful Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for a Medically Underserved Minority Population.
    Kim B; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Kim J; Shokar NK
    Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 28577699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?
    Bhurgri H; Samiullah S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jun; 27(6):327-328. PubMed ID: 28689518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving adherence to surveillance and screening recommendations for people with colorectal cancer and their first degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carey M; Sanson-Fisher R; Macrae F; Hill D; D'Este C; Paul C; Doran C
    BMC Cancer; 2012 Feb; 12():62. PubMed ID: 22314015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test is useful for identifying persons with high priority of early colonoscopy.
    Jung YS; Park CH; Kim NH; Park JH; Park DI; Sohn CI
    Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Mar; 50(3):254-259. PubMed ID: 29198569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.