These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31006056)

  • 41. HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia.
    Castro HE; Moreno-Mattar O; Rivillas JC
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2018; 16(Suppl 1):47. PubMed ID: 30455606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Prioritize Real-World Evidence Studies for Health Technology Management: Outcomes and Lessons Learned by the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration.
    Takhar P; Geirnaert M; Gavura S; Beca J; Mercer RE; Denburg A; Muñoz C; Tadrous M; Parmar A; Dionne F; Boehm D; Chambers C; Craig E; Trudeau M; Cheung MC; Houlihan J; McDonald V; Pechlivanoglou P; Taylor M; Wasylenko E; Wranik WD; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1876-1898. PubMed ID: 38668044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Synthesis of relevant information around non-core domains to support Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for decision making.
    Bayón-Yusta JC; Gutiérrez-Iglesias A; Galnares-Cordero L; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I
    GMS Health Innov Technol; 2024; 18():Doc02. PubMed ID: 38655192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?
    Dalziel K; Round A; Stein K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Payne L
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jan; 9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. PubMed ID: 15588556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Revealed preferences towards the appraisal of orphan drugs in Poland - multi criteria decision analysis.
    Kolasa K; Zwolinski KM; Zah V; Kaló Z; Lewandowski T
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2018 Apr; 13(1):67. PubMed ID: 29703227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review.
    Assasi N; Schwartz L; Tarride JE; Campbell K; Goeree R
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Apr; 14(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 24625039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis.
    Angelis A; Thursz M; Ratziu V; O'Brien A; Serfaty L; Canbay A; Schiefke I; Costa JBE; Lecomte P; Kanavos P
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Aug; 40(6):830-845. PubMed ID: 32845234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A review and classification of approaches for dealing with uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare decisions.
    Broekhuizen H; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; van Til JA; Hummel JM; IJzerman MJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 25630758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Value based healthcare and Health Technology Assessment for emerging market countries: joint efforts to overcome barriers.
    Otte M; Dauben HP; Ahn J; Gutierrez Ibarluzea I; Drummond M; Simoens S; Kaló Z; Suh DC
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Nov; 24(9):1061-1066. PubMed ID: 39221874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Claxton K; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Philips Z; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul; 8(31):1-103, iii. PubMed ID: 15248937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Application of HTA research on policy decision-making.
    Youngkong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S119-26. PubMed ID: 24964709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Developing a decision support system to link health technology assessment (HTA) reports to the health system policies in Iran.
    Yazdani S; Jadidfard MP
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 May; 32(4):504-515. PubMed ID: 28025325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.
    Adunlin G; Diaby V; Xiao H
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):1894-905. PubMed ID: 25327341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a university hospital setting.
    Martelli N; Hansen P; van den Brink H; Boudard A; Cordonnier AL; Devaux C; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():201-8. PubMed ID: 26705065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
    Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South Africa.
    Miot J; Wagner M; Khoury H; Rindress D; Goetghebeur MM
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2012 Feb; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 22376143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How can multi criteria decision analysis support value assessment of pharmaceuticals? - Findings from a systematic literature review.
    Kolasa K; Zah V; Kowalczyk M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Aug; 18(4):379-391. PubMed ID: 29707985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.
    Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Mar; 14(3):181-234. PubMed ID: 27532144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.
    Marsh K; Caro JJ; Hamed A; Zaiser E
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 15(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 27928659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.