310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31006735)
1. Fracture resistance of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic four-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses after artificial aging.
Güngör MB; Nemli SK; Bal BT; Tamam E; Yılmaz H; Aydın C
J Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 61(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 31006735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF MONOLITHIC AND VENEERED THREE-UNIT ZIRCONIA FDPS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.
Alsarani MM; El-Mowaf OY; Coyle TW; Rizkalla A; Fava J
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):112-122. PubMed ID: 37196037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Agustin-Panadero R; Suarez MJ
Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):816-821. PubMed ID: 28845035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of veneering technique on the fracture resistance of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Chaar MS; Witkowski S; Strub JR; Att W
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jan; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 22672267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) veneered with layered and milled (CAD-on) veneering ceramics: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Grohmann P; Bindl A; Hämmerle C; Mehl A; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2015; 46(10):871-80. PubMed ID: 26345100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.
Schultheis S; Strub JR; Gerds TA; Guess PC
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1407-13. PubMed ID: 23001151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior zirconia fixed dental prostheses veneered with milled lithium disilicate (CADon).
Blatz MB; Hariton-Gross K; Anadioti E; Mante F; Zhang Y; Saleh N
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jan; 34(1):136-144. PubMed ID: 35083844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance of Straight and Angulated Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Anterior Three-Unit Lithium Disilicate Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Saker S; El-Shahat S; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 27861648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]