142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31007356)
1. Confidence Intervals for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in the Presence of Ignorable Missing Data.
Cho H; Matthews GJ; Harel O
Int Stat Rev; 2019 Apr; 87(1):152-177. PubMed ID: 31007356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural networks based on attention architecture are robust to data missingness for early predicting hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients.
Zeng Z; Liu Y; Yao S; Liu J; Xiao B; Liu C; Gong X
Digit Health; 2023; 9():20552076231171482. PubMed ID: 37179744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.
Li P; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Karnes RJ; Schipper MJ
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(15):3477-3498. PubMed ID: 33843085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity to imputation models and assumptions in receiver operating characteristic analysis with incomplete data.
Karakaya J; Karabulut E; Yucel RM
J Stat Comput Simul; 2015; 85(17):3498-3511. PubMed ID: 26379316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical likelihood inference for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using ranked set samples.
Moon C; Wang X; Lim J
Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1219-1245. PubMed ID: 35593451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value.
Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aksel G
Turk J Emerg Med; 2023; 23(4):195-198. PubMed ID: 38024184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):906-16. PubMed ID: 21361890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.
Long Q; Zhang X; Johnson BA
Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):559-67. PubMed ID: 20825391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Superiority Effect Size Measure and the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.
Ruscio J; Mullen T
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar; 47(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 26734848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for ROC curve in the presence of missing biomarker values.
Cheng W; Tang N
Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1038-1059. PubMed ID: 31957095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of breast cancer recurrence based on imputed data: a simulation study.
Abassi RA; Msengwa AS
BioData Min; 2022 Dec; 15(1):30. PubMed ID: 36476234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of Area Under the ROC Curve under nonignorable verification bias.
Yu W; Kim JK; Park T
Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):2149-2166. PubMed ID: 31367164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data.
Hai Y; Qin G
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4789-4820. PubMed ID: 32944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximum likelihood abundance estimation from capture-recapture data when covariates are missing at random.
Liu Y; Liu Y; Li P; Zhu L
Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 32672861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A unified Bayesian framework for exact inference of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Lin R; Chan KG; Shi H
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2269-2287. PubMed ID: 34468238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
