These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31008627)

  • 21. Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile.
    Loft S; Bowden VK; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():177-82. PubMed ID: 25247678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating prospective memory via eye tracking: No evidence for a monitoring deficit in older adults.
    Ballhausen N; Lauffs MM; Herzog MH; Kliegel M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():107-116. PubMed ID: 31655183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prospective memory under acute stress: The role of (output) monitoring and ongoing-task demands.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Surrey C; Miller R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Oct; 164():107046. PubMed ID: 31323256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
    Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reducing prospective memory error and costs in simulated air traffic control: External aids, extending practice, and removing perceived memory requirements.
    Loft S; Chapman M; Smith RE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Sep; 22(3):272-84. PubMed ID: 27608067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective memory decision control: A computational model of context effects on prospective memory.
    Strickland L; Bowden V; Loft S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 37079843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks.
    Dirnberger G; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):535-48. PubMed ID: 20232508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proceeding with care for successful prospective memory: Do we delay ongoing responding or actively monitor for cues?
    Anderson FT; Rummel J; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1036-1050. PubMed ID: 29553768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do Inhibitory Control Demands Affect Event-Based Prospective Memory Performance in ADHD?
    Altgassen M; Koch A; Kliegel M
    J Atten Disord; 2019 Jan; 23(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 24448223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating the cost to ongoing tasks not associated with prospective memory task requirements.
    Smith RE; Loft S
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():1-13. PubMed ID: 24780347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Toward a better understanding of costs in prospective memory: A meta-analytic review.
    Anderson FT; Strube MJ; McDaniel MA
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Nov; 145(11):1053-1081. PubMed ID: 31464456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating the effects of ongoing-task bias on prospective memory.
    Strickland L; Loft S; Heathcote A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1495-1513. PubMed ID: 32160817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: behavioural data and neural correlates.
    Bisiacchi PS; Schiff S; Ciccola A; Kliegel M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Apr; 47(5):1362-73. PubMed ID: 19428400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Cookson SL; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):798-812. PubMed ID: 32324028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. After-effects without monitoring costs: The impact of prospective memory instructions on task switching performance.
    Meier B; Rey-Mermet A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():85-99. PubMed ID: 28477841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual biases during cued task switching relate to decision process differences between children and adults.
    Martinez JE; Mack ML; Bauer JR; Roe MA; Church JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1603-1618. PubMed ID: 30024226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interference between a fast-paced spatial puzzle task and verbal memory demands.
    Epling SL; Blakely MJ; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1899-1907. PubMed ID: 28314919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions.
    Koslov SR; Mukerji A; Hedgpeth KR; Lewis-Peacock JA
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 31601634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.