449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31008809)
1. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Jung DH; Ko BS; Kim YJ; Kim WY
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of the Shock Index for Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Rassameehiran S; Teerakanok J; Suchartlikitwong S; Nugent K
South Med J; 2017 Nov; 110(11):738-743. PubMed ID: 29100227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.
Custódio Lima J; Garcia Montes C; Kibune Nagasako C; Soares Ruppert Reis GF; Meirelles Dos Santos JO; Guerrazzi F; Mesquita MA
Digestion; 2013; 88(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 24335273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk Factors Associated with Mortality and Increased Drug Costs in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Lu M; Sun G; Zhang XL; Zhang XM; Liu QS; Huang QY; Lau JW; Yang YS
Hepatogastroenterology; 2015 Jun; 62(140):907-12. PubMed ID: 26902026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic management of nonvariceal, nonulcer upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Tjwa ET; Holster IL; Kuipers EJ
Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2014 Dec; 43(4):707-19. PubMed ID: 25440920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mortality from nonulcer bleeding is similar to that of ulcer bleeding in high-risk patients with nonvariceal hemorrhage: a prospective database study in Italy.
Marmo R; Del Piano M; Rotondano G; Koch M; Bianco MA; Zambelli A; Di Matteo G; Grossi E; Cipolletta L; ; ; Prometeo Investigators
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):263-72, 272.e1. PubMed ID: 22000792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.
Lahiff C; Shields W; Cretu I; Mahmud N; McKiernan S; Norris S; Silke B; Reynolds JV; O'Toole D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 24(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 22113209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment and prognosis in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Laursen SB
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4797. PubMed ID: 24547604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Burke SJ; Golzarian J; Weldon D; Sun S
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1714-26. PubMed ID: 17058080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
