These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31008825)

  • 1. Factors That Influence the Success of Contact Lens Fitting in Presbyopes: A Multicentric Survey.
    Zeri F; Di Censi M; Livi S; Ercoli A; Naroo SA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Nov; 45(6):382-389. PubMed ID: 31008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Sha J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jul; 45(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 30601291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Survey of Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers in a University Setting.
    Rueff EM; Varghese RJ; Brack TM; Downard DE; Bailey MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 27232896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective evaluation of the performance of medical contact lenses fitted using a contact lens selection algorithm.
    Visser ES; Wisse RP; Soeters N; Imhof SM; Van der Lelij A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Aug; 39(4):298-306. PubMed ID: 26917334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of accommodative response and visual performance in non-presbyopes wearing low-add contact lenses.
    Koh S; Inoue R; Sato S; Haruna M; Asonuma S; Nishida K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):226-231. PubMed ID: 31327577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision.
    Gauthier CA; Holden BA; Grant T; Chong MS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Nov; 69(11):858-62. PubMed ID: 1454302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes.
    du Toit R; Situ P; Simpson T; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jun; 78(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 11444637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 93(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 26704141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of presbyopia with contact lenses: comparative success rates with three systems.
    Back AP; Holden BA; Hine NA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):518-25. PubMed ID: 2771342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Amrizal H; Diec J; Yeotikar N; Jong M; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30451806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear.
    Lakkis C; Goldenberg SA; Woods CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1022-9. PubMed ID: 16357643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing a modified fitting approach for improved multifocal contact lens fitting.
    Merchea M; Evans D; Kannarr S; Miller J; Kaplan M; Nixon L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Oct; 42(5):540-545. PubMed ID: 31253425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presbyopia correction with multifocal contact lenses: Evaluation of silent reading performance using eye movements analysis.
    Plainis S; Ktistakis E; Tsilimbaris MK
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Aug; 46(4):101853. PubMed ID: 37164776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia.
    Morgan PB; Efron N; Woods CA;
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 21039845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.