These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31008825)

  • 21. An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia.
    Morgan PB; Efron N; Woods CA;
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 21039845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the ZEBRA 2000 (Z-10) Breger Vision bifocal contact lens.
    Smith VM; Koffler BH; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 11071346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relationship between Visual Acuity, Subjective Vision, and Willingness to Purchase Simultaneous-image Contact Lenses.
    Jong M; Tilia D; Sha J; Diec J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Apr; 96(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 30907859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates.
    Westin E; Wick B; Harrist RB
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 11145300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance.
    Chu BS; Wood JM; Collins MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Sep; 51(9):4861-6. PubMed ID: 20375338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers.
    Young G; Veys J; Pritchard N; Coleman S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Nov; 22(6):516-27. PubMed ID: 12477016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving your spectacle patients' in-practice experience with contact lenses during frame selection.
    Mayers M; Jansen Bishop M; Walerius D; Conway K; Usseglio M; Hasty S; Allison S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Aug; 42(4):406-410. PubMed ID: 30392895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The application of a computerised videokeratography (CVK) based contact lens fitting software programme on irregularly shaped corneal surfaces.
    Nosch DS; Ong GL; Mavrikakis I; Morris J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 17689133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual Performance of a Multifocal Contact Lens versus Monovision in Established Presbyopes.
    Woods J; Woods C; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 92(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers.
    Sulley A; Young G; Hunt C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Feb; 40(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 27818113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the quality of vision with contact lenses adequate? Not in all instances.
    Kastl PR
    Cornea; 1990; 9 Suppl 1():S20-2; discussion S23-4. PubMed ID: 2189674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Twelve-month success rates with a hydrogel diffractive bifocal contact lens.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):941-7. PubMed ID: 1300517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.