157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31009657)
1. Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome sets.
Gargon E; Williamson PR; Blazeby JM; Kirkham JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():36-44. PubMed ID: 31009657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric core outcome sets had deficiencies and lacked child and family input: A methodological review.
Goren K; Monsour A; Stallwood E; Offringa M; Butcher NJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 155():13-21. PubMed ID: 36528231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment highlights need for improvement in standards of development of core outcome sets for rare genetic diseases.
Ciucă A; Banka S; Newman WG; Moldovan R; Kirkham JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 161():84-93. PubMed ID: 37423316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The standards of obstetrics and gynecology core outcome sets: A scoping review.
Shi J; Gao Y; Wu S; Niu M; Chen Y; Yan M; Song Z; Feng H; Zhang J; Tian J
Integr Med Res; 2022 Mar; 11(1):100776. PubMed ID: 34745879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.
Kirkham JJ; Davis K; Altman DG; Blazeby JM; Clarke M; Tunis S; Williamson PR
PLoS Med; 2017 Nov; 14(11):e1002447. PubMed ID: 29145404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Core Outcome Sets Relevant to Maternity Service Users: A Scoping Review.
Slavin V; Creedy DK; Gamble J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Mar; 66(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 33565682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
Gargon E; Gorst SL; Williamson PR
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225980. PubMed ID: 31830081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of core outcome sets of Food for Special Medical Purposes designed for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study protocol.
Mu D; Gong J; Wei Y; Chen M; Yu J; Du L; Hu W
Trials; 2023 Mar; 24(1):223. PubMed ID: 36959627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review.
Sabet TS; Anderson DB; Stubbs PW; Buchbinder R; Terwee CB; Chiarotto A; Gagnier J; Verhagen AP
Syst Rev; 2022 Nov; 11(1):248. PubMed ID: 36403060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Schlessinger DI; Iyengar S; Yanes AF; Chiren SG; Godinez-Puig V; Chen BR; Kurta AO; Schmitt J; Deckert S; Furlan KC; Poon E; Cartee TV; Maher IA; Alam M; Sobanko JF
Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28701207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.
Wuytack F; Gutke A; Stuge B; Mørkved S; Olsson C; Robinson HS; Vøllestad NK; Öberg B; Wikmar LN; Mena JJS; Smith V
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):158. PubMed ID: 30509216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A scoping review of core outcome sets and their 'mapping' onto real-world data using prostate cancer as a case study.
Meregaglia M; Ciani O; Banks H; Salcher-Konrad M; Carney C; Jayawardana S; Williamson P; Fattore G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):41. PubMed ID: 32103725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys.
Biggane AM; Brading L; Ravaud P; Young B; Williamson PR
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 29454368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inconsistency and low transparency were found between core outcome set protocol and full text publication: a comparative study.
Liu M; Gao Y; Yuan Y; Shi S; Yang K; Lu C; Wu J; Zhang J; Tian J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():59-69. PubMed ID: 33227446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review.
Dodd S; Gorst SL; Young A; Lucas SW; Williamson PR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():127-133. PubMed ID: 37054902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies on Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (COSCarP): a study protocol.
D'Souza R; Hall C; Sermer M; Siu S; Silversides C
Trials; 2020 Mar; 21(1):300. PubMed ID: 32228655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Core Outcome Set for GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints (COSGROVE).
Healy P; Gordijn S; Ganzevoort W; Beune I; Baschat A; Khalil A; Kenny L; Bloomfield F; Daly M; Papageorghiou A; Devane D
Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):451. PubMed ID: 30134949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core Outcome Sets in Child Health: A Systematic Review.
Lei R; Shen Q; Yang B; Hou T; Liu H; Luo X; Li Y; Zhang J; Norris SL; Chen Y
JAMA Pediatr; 2022 Nov; 176(11):1131-1141. PubMed ID: 36094597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for reporting outcomes of management of velopharyngeal dysfunction.
de Blacam C; Baylis AL; Kirschner RE; Smith SM; Sell D; Sie KCY; Harris HE; Orr DJA
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036824. PubMed ID: 32792441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Dodd S; Harman N; Taske N; Minchin M; Tan T; Williamson PR
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):570. PubMed ID: 32586349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
