These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31010400)

  • 1. Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses.
    Gregório Hertz P; Eher R; Etzler S; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):63-87. PubMed ID: 31010400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.
    Fedoroff JP; Richards D; Ranger R; Curry S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Oct; 57():29-38. PubMed ID: 27372881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG)--a tool for the risk assessment of violent offenders].
    Rossegger A; Urbaniok F; Danielsson C; Endrass J
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2009 Oct; 77(10):577-84. PubMed ID: 19821220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample.
    Glover AJJ; Churcher FP; Gray AL; Mills JF; Nicholson DE
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):507-518. PubMed ID: 28782966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexually violent predator risk assessments with the violence risk appraisal guide-revised: A shaky practice.
    Abbott BR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 52():62-73. PubMed ID: 28400064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination and Calibration Properties of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised in a Not Criminally Responsible Provincial Population.
    Wirove RL; Olver ME; Haag A
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1672-1687. PubMed ID: 36031861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R).
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):951-65. PubMed ID: 23647040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version in a community sexual offense outpatient setting.
    Wielinga FE; Olver ME
    Psychol Assess; 2024; 36(6-7):407-424. PubMed ID: 38619490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism.
    Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Exploratory Study of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses in Singapore.
    Tsao IT; Chu CM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Mar; 33(2):157-175. PubMed ID: 31674276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism.
    Thornton D; Mann R; Webster S; Blud L; Travers R; Friendship C; Erikson M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():225-35; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
    Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The predictive and incremental validity of ADHD beyond the VRAG-R in a high-risk sample of young offenders.
    Gregório Hertz P; Müller M; Barra S; Turner D; Rettenberger M; Retz W
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 272(8):1469-1479. PubMed ID: 34860261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.